MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

A type $II_{1}$ factor $\mathcal{M}$ is solid if for every diffuse von Neumann subalgebra $\mathcal{A}$ of $\mathcal{M}$, the relative commutant $\mathcal{A}'\cap \mathcal{M}$ is injective. (See Ozawa's excellent paper:

A type $II_{1}$ factor $M$ with trace $\tau$ has Property $\Gamma$ if for every finite subset $\{ x_{1}, x_{2},..., x_{n} \} \subseteq M$ and each $\epsilon >0$, there is a unitary element $u$ in $M$ with $\tau (u)=0$ and $||ux_{j}-x_{j}u||_{2}<\epsilon$ for all $1 \leq j \leq n$. (Here $||T||_2=(\tau(T^{*}T))^{1/2}$ for $T\in M$.)

We say that a type $II_{1}$ factor $M$ with trace $\tau$ is $\Gamma$-solid if for every diffuse von Neumann subalgebra $\mathcal{A}$ of $\mathcal{M}$, the relative commutant $\mathcal{A}'\cap \mathcal{M}$ has property $\Gamma$.

Since every injective von Neumann algebra has property $\Gamma$, the notion of $\Gamma$-solidity is weaker than that of solidity.

Is every $\Gamma$-solid factor solid?

share|cite|improve this question
Hey Jon, There are weaker forms, such as semi-solidity, or even say prime. Of course these are weakenings of a different form. For instance, semi-solid you restrict which algebras you are taking relative commutants of, while $\Gamma$-solidity eases the requirement of the relative commutant itself. Also I was just wondering, is this notion of $\Gamma$-solid in the literature, i haven't heard of it before. – Owen Sizemore Jan 12 '11 at 16:23
Thanks, Owen! You are right, there are other weakenings of solidity. As far as I know, this notion of Γ solidity hasn't appeared anywhere. I started thinking about it, wondering how "rigid" the notion of solidity should be in various regards. If this is completely inane, Sorin would know. – Jon Bannon Jan 12 '11 at 22:49

Sorry, this was a wrong example. I should have thought about it better.

share|cite|improve this answer
You haven't actually shown that $L(G)$ is $\Gamma$-solid. – Owen Sizemore Jan 12 '11 at 16:18

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.