Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

There have been many results on the first sign change of $\pi(x)-{\mathrm{li}}(x)$: among others, Lehman, te Riele, Bays & Hudson, Demichael, Chao & Plymen, and most recently Saouter & Demichel. These provide upper bounds (as well as lower bounds on some region in which $\pi(x)>{\mathrm{li}}(x)$).

Could these methods be used to generate a lower bound? That is, a region [2, y] in which $\pi(x)<{\mathrm{li}}(x)$. (Or even a region [x, y] where y is smaller than the best known upper bound, such that, in principle at least, direct calculations could yield a lower bound.)

It seems unlikely that direct searches like [2] will ever be able to resolve the exact value of the first crossing.


[1] C. Bays and R. H. Hudson. "A new bound for the smallest x with $\pi(x)>{\mathrm{li}}(x)$" Mathematics of Computation 69 (2000), pp. 1285–1296.

[2] T. Kotnik. "The prime-counting function and its analytic approximations", Advances in Computational Mathematics 29 (2008), pp. 55-70.

[2] R. Sherman Lehman. "On the difference $\pi(x)-{\mathrm{li}}(x)$" Acta Arithmetica 11 (1965), pp. 397–410.

[3] H. J. J. te Riele. "On the sign of the difference $\pi(x)-{\mathrm{li}}(x)$" Mathematics of Computation 48 (1987), pp. 323–328.

[4] Yannick Saouter and Patrick Demichel. "A sharp region where $\pi(x)-{\mathrm{li}}(x)$ is positive" Mathematics of Computation 79 (2010), pp. 2395-2405.

share|improve this question
    
Just to be clear: is the lower limit of your definition of $\mathrm{li}$ 0 (i.e., Cauchy principal value integral) or 2? –  J. M. Dec 7 '10 at 14:00
    
@J. M.: I was taking the Cauchy principal value where li(2) = 1.045..., but I would be interested in an answer to either, provided of course that x >= 8 to avoid small answers. –  Charles Dec 7 '10 at 15:11

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

There are some explicit results in the work S. B. Stechkin, A. Yu. Popov, “The asymptotic distribution of prime numbers on the average”, Uspekhi Mat. Nauk, 51:6(312) (1996), 21–88

share|improve this answer
1  
Thank you. I found the translation S. B. Stechkin and A. Yu Popov, Russ. Math. Surv. 51 (1996), pp. 1025-1092. –  Charles Nov 12 '12 at 15:54

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.