Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This questions asks for your intuition and insight as I'm surprised by how little is known about the difference between nonnegative and positive curvature. I don't want to be completely vague, so I could ask: What are the difficulties and currently blocked paths to solving the Hopf Conjecture? (Does $S^2\times S^2$ support a metric of positive curvature?). But in general, I would like to know what others might know on why it's difficult to determine if a given closed simply-connected space of nonnegative curvature can also admit positive curvature. As far as I know, there are no obstructions, how come? The amount of examples of nonnegative curvature compared to that of examples of positive curvature seem to suggest there should be something distinguishing the two.

share|improve this question
Interesting question. Is there any simply-connected closed manifold which is known to have nonnegative but not positive sectional curvature? –  Johannes Ebert Dec 1 '10 at 20:50
This is well-known open (and fundamental) problem. A recent survey is at front.math.ucdavis.edu/0701.5389. –  Igor Belegradek Dec 1 '10 at 21:15
add comment

1 Answer

Yau asked in 1982 if there is any compact simply connected manifold with nonnegative curvature for which one can prove that it does not admit a metric of positive curvature. This question opens his list of unsolved problems in geometry (see "Seminar on Differential Geometry", p. 670.)

Let me quote from "A Panoramic View of Riemannian Geometry" by Berger (Springer 2003, p. 579):

It is not surprising that many people tried to address Yau’s remark, starting with the Hopf conjecture on $S^2 × S^2$, by trying to deform such a metric with $K ≥ 0$ into one with $K >0$. This means considering some one parameter family $g(t)$ of metrics and computing the various derivatives at $t = 0$ of the sectional curvature. Technically it is very easy to compute such a derivative for a given tangent plane, but what is difficult is to find a variation for which all the derivatives would be positive. Today this approach still does not work.

A major difficulty is that it is not clear how to find the critical set of the sectional curvature (as a function on the set of tangent planes).

The earlier short survey by Bourguignon contains a discussion of the reasons why some seemingly natural approaches fail.

share|improve this answer
More recent remarks on Hopf conjecture (about existence of positively curved metric on $S^2\times S^2$) can be found in the survey by Wilking: front.math.ucdavis.edu/0707.3091. This problem is somewhat poisoned as many talented people thought hard of it with little or no progress. –  Igor Belegradek Dec 1 '10 at 23:55
I forgot to say that the remarks are hidden on page 26. –  Igor Belegradek Dec 1 '10 at 23:56
@Igor Belegradek: thank you for the comments and reference. –  Andrey Rekalo Dec 2 '10 at 6:36
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.