MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let P be a normal variety over an algebraically closed field k, G a torus over k acting on P, assume that the stabilizer of the generic point of P is reduced (resp. connected or both), is it ture then that the stabilizer of every point of P is reduced (resp. connected or both)? And WHY?

What will happen if we assume moreover that P has finitly many G-obits?

share|cite|improve this question

For "connected" the answer is surely no, as the following example shows.

Let $k=\mathbb{C}$, and consider the action of $\mathbb{C}^*$ on $\mathbb{C}^3-\{0\}$ defined as

$\lambda \cdot (x,y,z):=(\lambda x, \lambda y, \lambda^2 z)$.

Then the general point has trivial stabilizer, whereas the points on the line $x=y=0$ have a non-connected stabilizer isomorphic tO $\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$. The quotient is actually the weighted projective space $\mathbb{P}(1,1,2)$, which has a singularity of type $\frac{1}{2}(1,1)$ at the point $[0:0:1]$.

For "reduced" the answer is yes when $k$ has characteristic $0$, since every group scheme in characteristic zero is reduced.

When $k$ has characteristic $p >0$, I suspect that there are counterexamples. For instance, if $p=2$ it seems to me that, repeating the previous construction with $k$ instead of $\mathbb{C}$, the points lying on the line $x=y=0$ have stabilizer isomorphic to the non-reduced group scheme $\mu_2:=\textrm{Spec }k[t]/(t^2-1)$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.