Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $C$ be a projective non-singular curve defined over a field $K$ with the characteristic zero. Let $y,z$ be non-constant rational functions defined $K$ such that $y$ is defined at all poles and zeros of $z$ and gives an injective mapping of this set into the algebraic closure of $K.$ Let $(y_1,y_2,...,y_m)$ be all conjugates of $y$ over $K(z)$ and $r$ be the largest of the multiplicities of the zeros of $z.$ If $(y'_1,...,y'_m)$ is a specialization of $(y_1,y_2,...,y_m)$ over $z \rightarrow 0.$ \ Is this true that the multiplicity of any $y'_k$ in $(y'_1,...,y'_m)$ is less than $r ?$

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

After a few days thinking about this question, I found out the answer. I write it down here, it might help someone get trouble like me.

Let $\mathcal{o}$ be valuation ring generated by maximal ideal $(z)$ in $K(z)$ and $v$ be the absolute value corresponding to it. Let $K(z)_v$ be the completeness of $K(z)$ with respect to $v$. Let $K(w)$ be the function field of $C$, then it is easy to see that if $\mathcal{o}'$ is an valuation ring extending $\mathcal{o}$ to $K(z)$ then $\mathcal{o}'$ is the valuation ring of a zero point $Q$ of $z$ and its ramification index is the multiplicity of $Q$ in the zero divisor of $z$. Hence, the ramification index of $\mathcal{o}’ \cap K(z,y)$ is less than the multiplicity of $Q$.

Because $y$ defines at zero points of $z$, we see that $y$ is integral over $\mathcal{o}$. Thenfore, the absolute value corresponding to $\mathcal{o}’ \cup K(z,y)$ in $K(y,z)$ is an unramified extension of $v$. Hence, its ramification index equals its local degree. This imlies the local degree is less than the multiplicity of $Q

We know that each extension of $\mathcal{o}$ to $K(y,z)$ is induced by an embedding $\sigma: K(y,z)\rightarrow \overline{K(z)_v}$ (the algebraic closure of $K(z)_v$). Let $F(Y)$ be the irreducible polynomial of $y$ over $K(z)$ and $F(Y)=F_1(Y)\cdots F_k(Y)$ be its irreducible factorization in $K(z)_v$ (the completeness of $K(z)$ with respect to $v$). Note that $F_i\not = F_j$ by $K$ having zero characteristic. Then, $(y_1,\ldots,y_m)$ are zeros of $F(Y)$.

Consider an extension $\overline{\mathcal{o}}$ of $\mathcal{o}$ to $\overline{K(z)_v}$. We claim that $y_i,y_j$ are mapped to the same image by the canonical place $\phi$ of $\bar{\mathcal{o}}$ iff they are zero points of the same $F_s(Y)$. Indeed, suppose $\sigma_i, \sigma_j: K(z,y) \rightarrow \overline{K(z)_v}$ are embeddings which map $y$ to $y_i,y_j$, respectively. Then, $\phi \circ \sigma_i =\phi \circ \sigma_j$ as places of $K(y,z)$. Hence, they induce the same absolute value in $K(y,z)$. This follows our claim. Now, we can easily imply the answer of the question, as the multiplicity of $y’_i$ in $(y’_1,\ldots,y’_m)$ equals degree of some $F_s$ which equal the local degree.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.