MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $X$ be a smooth projective variety over an algebraically closed characteristic $0$ field $\mathbb{K}$, and let $\Omega^\bullet_X$ be the de Rham sheaf of complexes of $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules of algebraic differential forms on $X$. Let $\mathbf{R}\Gamma\Omega^\bullet_X$ be (a complex representing) the derived gloval sections of $\Omega^\bullet_X$, and let $End(\mathbf{R}\Gamma\Omega^\bullet_X)$ be the total complex of hom-bicomplex $Hom(\mathbf{R}\Gamma\Omega^\bullet_X,\mathbf{R}\Gamma\Omega^\bullet_X)$.

I have two questions.

i) Is $End(\mathbf{R}\Gamma\Omega^\bullet_X)$ quasi-isomorphic to $End(H^\bullet(X;\mathbb{K}))$as differential graded Lie algebras? (where the latter has trivial differential). (edit: this should be easy and true in general. thanks Torsten).

ii) Now consider a sheaf endomorphism $f:\Omega^\bullet_X\to \Omega^\bullet_X$ (as sheaves of complexes of vector spaces) such that $f:ker(d)\to Im(d)$, so that $f$ will induce the zero morphism on the cohomology sheaf $\mathcal{H}^\bullet(\Omega_X^\bullet)$. And consider the induced morphism $\mathbf{R}\Gamma f: \mathbf{R}\Gamma \Omega^\bullet_X \to \mathbf{R}\Gamma \Omega^\bullet_X$. Is it true that $\mathbf{R}\Gamma f: ker(d)\to Im(d)$? (I suspect the answer is yes in this case: a morphism of sheaves wich is trivial on local cohomology should be trivial on global cohomology, since there is a spectral sequence with coefficients in local cohomology abutting to global cohomology)

share|cite|improve this question
Quasi-isomorphic as what? As complexes of vector spaces it is trivially true (true for all complexes). – Torsten Ekedahl Nov 25 '10 at 22:02
Sorry, I was too inaccurate. I meant quasi-isomorphic as differential graded Lie algebras. I guess the answer is yes in this case, too, again for any complex of vector spaces $C^\bullet$, by considering the span $End(C^\bullet)\leftarrow L\rightarrow End(H^\bullet(C^\bullet))$, where $L=\{\varphi\in End(C^\bullet)\,|\, \varphi(Z^\bullet)\subseteq Z^\bullet\,,\, \varphi(B^\bullet)\subseteq B^\bullet\}$. But since I wasn't able to find this trivial remark anywhere, I was unsure. – domenico fiorenza Nov 26 '10 at 6:38
I think it depends on if you mean End of dg vector spaces or End of dg algebras... – Kevin H. Lin Nov 26 '10 at 7:34
I am interpreting it to mean End of dg algebras... – Kevin H. Lin Nov 26 '10 at 7:35
I was intending End of dg vector spaces. Yet going in the direction of dg algebras is a very nice cue, thanks! – domenico fiorenza Nov 26 '10 at 8:02

Here is an extended version of a comment above.

First, one can consider $R\Gamma\Omega^\bullet_X$ as a complex of vector spaces. Any complex of vector spaces is quasi-isomorphic to its cohomology. Taking this complex to be $End(R\Gamma\Omega^\bullet_X)$ we get $$End(R\Gamma\Omega^\bullet_X)\sim H^\bullet (End(R\Gamma\Omega^\bullet_X))\cong End (H^\bullet(X)).$$

Here $\sim$ stands for quasi-isomorphic and we use the fact that if $K^\bullet$ and $L^\bullet$ are two complexes of vector spaces, then (as graded vector spaces) $$H^\bullet (Hom(K^\bullet, L^\bullet))\cong Hom (H^\bullet(K^\bullet), H^\bullet(K^\bullet)).$$

There is one slightly tricky point here: both $End(R\Gamma\Omega^\bullet_X)$ and $ End (H^\bullet(X))$ are dg-algebras (the latter with zero differential) and one can ask if they are quasi-isomorphic as such. The answer is yes; this can be shown as follows: if $K^\bullet$ and $L^\bullet$ are homotopy equivalent complexes (in fact, in any abelian category), there is an $A_\infty$ quasi-isomorphism between $End(K^\bullet)$ and $End(L^\bullet)$ and hence $End(K^\bullet)$ and $End(L^\bullet)$ are quasi-isomorphic as dg-algebras, meaning they can be connected by a chain of quasi-isomorphisms. (This is probably an overkill, but I can't think of a more straightforward argument at the moment.)

Second, e.g. by taking the Dolbeault resolution one can think of $R\Gamma\Omega^\bullet_X$ as a commutative dg-algebra (cdga) and so one can consider $End_{R\Gamma\Omega^\bullet_X}(R\Gamma\Omega^\bullet_X)$, the endomorphisms of $R\Gamma\Omega^\bullet_X$ as a module over itself. The result will be again $R\Gamma\Omega^\bullet_X$: we use the fact that the natural identification of algebras $Hom_A(A,A)\cong A$ is compatible with the differentials if $A$ is a dg-algebra. Now, again from the Dolbeault resolution, $R\Gamma\Omega^\bullet_X$ is just the algebra of smooth complex-valued forms on $X$, which, as shown by Deligne, Griffiths, Morgan, SUllivan, Real homotopy theory... is quasi-isomorphic to $H^\bullet (X)$ with zero differential.

So we get $$End_{R\Gamma\Omega^\bullet_X}(R\Gamma\Omega^\bullet_X)\cong R\Gamma\Omega^\bullet_X\sim H^\bullet (X)\cong End_{H^\bullet(X)}(H^\bullet (X)).$$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.