MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Assume that $G$ is a semi-simple linear algebraic group defined over $\mathbb{Q}$, which is $\mathbb{Q}$-simple, and that $G(\mathbb(R)$ is non-compact, without $\mathbb{R}$-factors of rank 1. Then by Margulis's works, the arithmetic subgroups of $G(\mathbb{R})$ are the same as discrete lattice in $G(\mathbb{R})$. Here a lattice is a discrete subgroup $\Gamma$ such that the quotient $\Gamma\backslash G(\mathbb{R})$ is of finite volume with respect to the measure deduced from the left Haar measure. In particular, an arithmetic subgroup in $G(\mathbb{R})$ is Zariski dense in $G_\mathbb{R}$.

Conversely, a discrete subgroup $\Gamma$ in $G(\mathbb{R})$ is given, such that $\Gamma$ is also dense in $G_\mathbb{R}$ for the Zariski topology, what condition should one impose to make it arithmetic? Shall I assume $\Gamma$ to be finitely generated, or stable under certain actions such as $Aut(\mathbb{R/Q})$? I feel that such kind of results are more or less available in the literature, bu I'm far from an expert in this field.

Many thanks!

share|cite|improve this question
The group Aut($\mathbf{R}$) is trivial. – BCnrd Nov 17 '10 at 14:46
here by arithmetic subgroup I mean a subgroup of $G(\mathbb{R})$ that is commensurable with some congruence subgroup, the latter is given in term of the $\mathbb{Q}$-structure for $G$, namely $\Gamma$ is commensurable with some $\Gamma'=K\cap G(\mathbb{Q})$ with $K$ a compact open subgroup of $G(\mathbb{A}_f)$, $\mathbb{A}_f$ being the ring of finite adeles of $\mathbb{Q}$. Since $G(\mathbb{Q})$ is often too large (cf. the real approaximation), $\Gamma$ is not that large, rather it contains a cofinite subgroup of $G(\mathbb{Z})$, provided the latter being reasonably defined. – genshin Nov 17 '10 at 15:17
Suppose $G = {\rm{SO}}(q)$ for non-deg. quad. space $(V,q)$ over $\mathbf{Q}$ that is pos.-def. at the real place, and let $G' = {\rm{SO}}(q')$ be another, where $(V,q)$ and $(V',q')$ are not $\mathbf{Q}$-isomorphic but $\dim V = \dim V'$, so $G'_{\mathbf{R}} \simeq G_{\mathbf{R}}$. Then $G'$ is a different $\mathbf{Q}$-structure on $G_{\mathbf{R}}$, and provides lots of discrete subgroups of $G(\mathbf{R}) = G'(\mathbf{R})$ that aren't arithmetic relative to the $\mathbf{Q}$-structure $G$ yet pass all "algebraic" tests. Margulis' result includes existence of suitable $\mathbf{Q}$-structure. – BCnrd Nov 17 '10 at 15:41
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Arbitrary Zariski-dense subgroups in a semisimple group can be very small from a real-analytic point of view. It seems that algebra cannot distinguish between "small" and "large" Zariski-dense subgroups, so most criteria to distinguish between the two have a strong non-algebraic flavour. (Of course one can also characterize arithmetic groups algebraically, but this has even less to do with the line of argument you seem to suggest.) From a dynamical point of view, the key difference between lattices and arbitrary Zariski-dense subgroups is that the former act transitively on the product of the Furstenberg boundary of the ambient Lie group with itself ("double ergodicity"). This is a sort of "largeness" property. There are various ways to capture this property, the most systematic way seems to me the concept of a generalized Weyl group due to Bader and Furman.

share|cite|improve this answer

an arithmetic subgroup is a lattice. This is in characteristic zero due to Borel and Raghunathan (MR0147566) and in positive characteristic due to Harder and Behr.

share|cite|improve this answer
The OP is well-aware of this, since it is stated in the first paragraph of the question (in a more precise form). The question being posed (I think) is to give "algebraic" and/or "group-theoretic" conditions (not involving measure) that imply arithmeticity for a discrete subgroup of $G(\mathbf{R})$ that is Zariski-dense in $G_{\mathbf{R}}$. – BCnrd Nov 17 '10 at 15:14
I wonder if an alternative description is possible, so that discrete Zariski dense subgroups $\Gamma$ would be close to being arithmetic. Of course I should not directly require $\Gamma$ to be also a lattice, which would be reduced back to Margulis' theorem. – genshin Nov 17 '10 at 15:20
Well, there is also a characterization which is totally algebraic. It is in a paper by Lubotzky and Venkataramana: A group theoretical characterisation of S-arithmetic groups in higher rank semi-simple groups. This does not use even the Zariski density, since you do not assume your group to be linear. – Keivan Karai Nov 17 '10 at 15:33
Plus, I do not think that Zariski dense subgroups are "close" in any sense to being arithmetic. Venkataramana has a very nice paper in which he constructs a variety of Zariski dense subgroups. – Keivan Karai Nov 17 '10 at 15:35
Dear Keivan: great, the constructions in that paper of Venkataramana are contained in arithmetic groups relative to a specified $\mathbf{Q}$-structure. So that seems to settle things in the negative (even if it is assumed that $\Gamma$ is commensurable with $\Gamma \cap G(\mathbf{Q})$). – BCnrd Nov 17 '10 at 16:16

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.