Sign up ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $p$ be a prime number, and $k$ a finite field with $q=p^n$ elements. Let $X$ be a scheme over $k$ and denote by $X'$ its base change to an algebraic closure $\bar k$ of $k$. Denote by $F_X:X\rightarrow X$ the Frobenius endomorphism of $X$ relative to $k$, and by $F'_X$ its base change to $X'$.

Let $f:Z\rightarrow X'$ be a closed subscheme, over $\bar k$, that is invariant under $F'_X$, meaning that there exists a $k'$-morphism $G:Z\rightarrow Z$ so that $f\circ G=F'_X\circ f$. Is it then true that $Z$ admits a descent to $k$?

share|cite|improve this question

1 Answer 1

If $Z$ is reduced, then the answer is yes, and the proof is rather elementary.

First, we can suppose $X$ is affine. Indeed, cover $X$ by affine open subsets $X_i$'s. Then $Z\cap X'_i$ is also stable by $F'_X$ because both $X'_i$ and $Z$ are stable by $F'_X$. If we can show that $Z\cap X'_i$ is defined over $k$, then $Z$ is clearly defined over $k$ too.

So suppose $X=\mathrm{Spec} A$ is affine. The closed subscheme $Z$ is defined over some finite extension $K/k$ of degree $r$. Let $I$ be the defining ideal of $Z$ in $X_K$. We have to show that $I$ is stable by $\mathrm{Gal}(K/k)$. Consider the generator $\sigma: \lambda \mapsto \lambda^{q^{r-1}}$ of $\mathrm{Gal}(K/k)$. Let $b=\sum_i a_i\otimes \alpha_i\in I$ with $a_i\in A$ and $\alpha_i\in K$. Denote by $(F_{X})_K$ the relative Frobenius $F_X$ of $X$ extended to $K$. Then $$\sigma(b)^q=(\sum_{i} a_i\otimes \alpha_{i}^{q^{r-1}})^q=\sum_{i} a_i^q\otimes \alpha_{i}=(F_{X})_K(b)\in I$$ Therefore $\sigma(b)\in \sqrt{I}=I$ and we are done.

share|cite|improve this answer
The reducedness hypothesis is necessary. Just consider $X$ to be the affine plane over $k$ and $Z$ a copy of $\alpha_p$ inside the kernel of the relative $q$-Frobenius over $\overline{k}$ ($q = |k|$) such that $Z$ corresponds to a tangent direction not rational over $k$. Then $Z$ is trivially preserved by the $q$-Frobenius endomorphism of $X$, yet not defined over $k$. –  BCnrd Nov 11 '10 at 5:32

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.