Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A continuous representation $\hat{\mathbb{Z}} \rightarrow GL_n(\mathbb{Q}_p)$ is determined by the image of $1$. But the image of $1$ does not always defines such a representation (consider for example the representation which sends $1$ on $p$ from $\mathbb{Z}$ to $GL_1(\mathbb{Q}_p)$). So my question is : what are the conditions on the image of $1$ ?

For example if $n=1$, then I know that $1$ must be sent on an element of $\mathbb{Z}_p^\times$, but I don't know if the converse is true.

EDIT: Correction about the example.

share|improve this question
2  
I'm not entirely right either: instead of "stabilises a lattice" I should say it induces an isomorphism from a lattice to itself. –  Kevin Buzzard Nov 4 '10 at 18:40
1  
If the image of 1 lands in some conjugate of GL(n,Z_p) then some finite power will land in the kernel of the map from this group to GL(n,Z/pZ) and then you're fine because this is pro-p and so there's a map from Z_p in. So the condition I suggest is sufficient. –  Kevin Buzzard Nov 4 '10 at 18:47
1  
The condition I suggest is also necessary. Choose a random lattice in Q_p^n. Choose a continuous representation of Z-hat. Continuous image of compact is compact so the subgroup generated by the images of this lattice is a lattice and that's the one which is preserved by 1 and -1. Ok so I think we're done. –  Kevin Buzzard Nov 4 '10 at 18:48
1  
Sorry, forgot to add the condition that the constant term must be invertible. –  Torsten Ekedahl Nov 4 '10 at 19:04
2  
@Kevin: yes I think so! Just to recap: the continuous image of a compact set is compact so the image has to land in a compact subgroup of $GL_n(Q_p)$ which we know is conjugate to a subgroup of $GL_n(Z_p)$. Conversely if $M = card(GL_n(F_p))$ and $f(1)$ is (say) in $GL_n(Z_p)$ then for every $k$, the image of $p^{k-1}M Z$ is in $1+p^k M_n(Z_p)$ so the map from $Z$ extends by uniform continuity. To relate this to Torsten's answer, it remains to check that a matrix is conjugate to an element of $GL_n(Z_p)$ iff its char poly has integral coeffts. –  Laurent Berger Nov 4 '10 at 19:24
show 5 more comments

1 Answer

up vote 19 down vote accepted

I am going to write a community wiki answer here which people can vote up. (See this meta thread concerning the Mathoverflow user, which bumps questions with no voted-up answer.)

Main result: A homomorphism $f: \mathbb Z \to GL_n(\mathbb Q_p)$ extends continuously to $\hat{\mathbb Z}$ if and only if the image of $f$ can be conjugated into $GL_n(\mathbb Z_p)$.

Proof: If $f:\hat{\mathbb Z} \to GL_n(\mathbb Q_p)$ is continuous, the image is compact, hence contained in a maximal compact subgroup, which can be conjugated into $GL_n(\mathbb Z_p)$.

Conversely, if $f:\mathbb Z \to GL_n(\mathbb Q_p)$ lands in a compact subgroup, then the closure of the image is compact, hence profinite (any compact subgroup of $GL_n(\mathbb Q_p)$ is profinite), and hence $f$ extends to $\hat{\mathbb Z}$ (since $\hat{\mathbb Z}$ is precisely the profinite completion of $\mathbb Z$). QED

As noted in the comments, to tell if a matrix (e.g. $f(1)$) can be conjugated into $GL_n(\mathbb Z_p)$, one simply has to look at the characteristic polynomial, and ask that all the coefficients lie in $\mathbb Z_p$, with the constant term being a unit. Thus to apply the theorem in practice, one simply computes the characteristic polynomial of $f(1)$ and see if its satisfies these conditions.

EDIT: Now actually made community wiki; sorry about that --- I thought I had already clicked the CW box, but obviously not. (The point is that the above argument is just a rephrasing of what is in the comments.)

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.