MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $a_1,a_2,\dots,a_n$ be independent identically distributed random vectors in $\mathbb R^n$. I need a bound for $E[|\det A|^{-1}]$, where $A$ is the matrix composed out of these vectors.

More specifically, these vectors take their values on a curve.

And more generally, I will be happy even if there is an estimate for a "non-square" determinant, precisely, for $E[G^{-1/2}]$, where $G$ is the Grammian determinant of $n$ iid vector in $\mathbb R^m$ and $m>n$.

Update: yes, I need an upper bound.

Precisely, I have something like $a_i = (f_1(\xi_i),f_2(\xi_i),\dots,f_n(\xi_i))$, where $f_j(x) = |x|^{-\alpha_i}\sin(\beta_i x)$ with $\alpha_i\in(1,2)$ and look for an estimate in terms of $|\alpha_i-\alpha_j|$ and $|\beta_i-\beta_j|$.

I'm flexible with the choice of distribution for $\xi$, but it should be the same for all sets of $\alpha$'s and $\beta$'s.

share|cite|improve this question
Do you want an upper bound, a lower bound, or both? – Mark Meckes Nov 4 '10 at 17:56
Can you write more precisely how do you choose the probability measure? Is your curve compact, and then you restrict the standard Lebesgue measure from $R^n$ to this curve? If this is the case then the answer certainly depends on the curve - how big a proportion of it lies near the point $(0,\ldots, 0)$. – Łukasz Grabowski Nov 4 '10 at 18:01

Perhaps my paper "How good is Hadamard's inequality for determinants", Canad. Math. Bull. 27 (1984) 260-264 may help.

A rough statement of the main theorem is the following. Assume that we have a probability distribution on the set of all real $n \times n$ matrices $A$ such that: (1) the density at $A$ only depends on the lengths of the columns of $A$; and (2) the probability that $\det A$ is nonzero is 1. Define the Hadamard ratio $h(A)$ to be $|det A|$ divided by the product of the lengths of the columns.

Then for nearly all $A$ the value of $h(A)^2$ is close to $n!/n^n$. (The theorem gives more precise results.)

share|cite|improve this answer
Note quite what I needed. Still I voting it up so you will be able to add a comment rather than posting an answer next time. – zhoraster Jul 6 '12 at 21:56

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.