MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $G$ be a group and $N$ a normal subgroup of $G$. If one knows a presentation for $G/N$, is it possible to obtain a presentation for $G$ ?

share|cite|improve this question

closed as too localized by Andrés E. Caicedo, Andreas Thom, S. Carnahan Nov 3 '10 at 11:23

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Not without other information. Consider the case N = G. – Qiaochu Yuan Nov 3 '10 at 0:36
The answer to the original question as written is Yes -- you just ignore $N$ and the presentation of $G/N$ and output canonical presentation of $G$. It is the one where set of generators is $G$ itself, and the set of relations is set underlying the kernel of the map from the free group on $G$ to $G$. You probably won't like this answer. If that's the case, it would be helpful to clarify your question. – JBorger Nov 3 '10 at 11:09
If you have a more refined version of your question that doesn't have an immediate trivial answer (e.g., a more detailed description of the state of knowledge about $N$), then please use the "edit" link below the tags to make the appropriate fixes. Once you have done that, please flag the question for moderator attention. – S. Carnahan Nov 3 '10 at 11:58

To get a presentation of the extension $G$, you need:

  1. A presentation of $G/N$.
  2. A presentation of $N$.
  3. The conjugation action of the generators of $G/N$ on those of $N$.
  4. The elements of $N$ obtained by evaluating the relators of $G/N$ as elements of $G$.

Here is the precise result, which I have cut and pasted from Proposition 2.5 of my own book "Handbook of Computational Group Theory".

Suppose that the group $G$ has a normal subgroup $N$, and that we have presentations $\langle Y \mid S \rangle$ of $N$ and $\langle \overline{X} \mid \overline{R} \rangle$ of $G/N$ on generating sets $Y$ and $\overline{X}$, respectively. Here we shall describe a general recipe for constructing a presentation of $G$ as an extension of $N$ by $G/N$.

For each $\overline{x} \in \overline{X}$, choose $x \in G$ with $xN = \overline{x}$, and let $X := \{ x \mid \overline{x} \in \overline{X}\}.$

Then, for any word $\overline{w} \in (\overline{X} \cup \overline{X}^{-1})^*$, we can define $w \in (X \cup X^{-1})^*$ with $wN = \overline{w}$, by substituting $x$ or $x^{-1}$ for each $\overline{x}$ or $\overline{x}^{-1}$ occurring in $\overline{w}$.

In particular, for each $\overline{r} \in \overline{R}$ there is a corresponding word $r$, and then $\overline{r} = 1_{G/N}$ implies that $r \in N$, so in the group $G$ we have $r =_G w_r$, for some word $w_r \in (Y \cup Y^{-1})^*$. Let $R$ be the set $\{ rw_r^{-1} \mid \overline{r} \in \overline{R} \}$.

For each $y \in Y$ and $x \in X$, we have $x^{-1}yx \in N$, so $x^{-1}yx =_G w_{xy}$ for some word $w_{xy} \in (Y \cup Y^{-1})^*$. Let $T$ be the set $\{ x^{-1}yxw_{xy}^{-1} \mid x \in X,\,y \in Y \}$.

Then $\langle X \cup Y \mid R \cup S \cup T \rangle$ is a presentation of $G$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you. That was very helpful. – Jim B Nov 3 '10 at 21:22

I think it's pretty clear that you also need a presentation for $N$ and to understand the map $G\to G/N$. (It's hard to say for sure, as you don't say how $G$ and $N$ are given to you.) Given that information, you can do it: see, for instance, Lemma 2.1 of this paper.

share|cite|improve this answer
To illustrate; if you know $N$ is cyclic of order 3, and $G/N$ is cyclic of order 2, you still don't know whether $G$ is cyclic of order 6 or symmetric on three letters. – Gerry Myerson Nov 3 '10 at 1:53
I appreciate your help. Thanks for the link. The paper is very interesting. – Jim B Nov 3 '10 at 21:26

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.