Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Hi,

I'm trying to understand the group of cycles (modulo numerical equivalence) contracted by a flopping contraction $f$.

More precisely, I'm in the setup of Definition 2.12 of this paper by Yukinobu Toda.

Let $f: X \to Y$ be a flopping contraction: $X$ is a smooth and projective CY3, f is birational, $Y$ is Gorenstein, $f$ is isomorphic in codimension one, $dim_\mathbb{R} N^1(X/Y)_\mathbb{R}=1$.

Where $N^1(X/Y)$ is the group of divisors of $X$ modulo numerical equivalence over $Y$ (viz. $D_1 \equiv D_2$ iff $D_1.C=D_2.C$ for all curves $C$ contracted by $f$).

(a side question is: what's the correct way to define "isomorphic in codimension d"?)

Denote, $N_1(X/Y)$ the group of 1-cycles contracted by $f$, modulo numerical equivalence.

What is $N_1(X/Y)$? (without tonsuring with Q or R)

In the paper cited above, it is written that the exceptional locus of $f$ is a tree of projective lines $C_1 \cup \ldots \cup C_m$

Is $C_i \equiv C_j$?

In the end I'm really hoping that $N_1(X/Y) = \mathbb{Z}$. If this is not the case, then I'm also interested in what happens after tensoring with $\mathbb{Q}$.

Thanks.

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 5 down vote accepted

1) $f$ is isomorphic in codimension $d$ if it is an isomorphism near any codimension $d$ point in either $X$ or $Y$. Equivalently, there exists closed subsets $Z\subseteq X$ and $W\subseteq Y$ such that ${\rm codim}_XZ\geq d+1$, ${\rm codim}_YW\geq d+1$, and $f:X\setminus Z\overset{\simeq}{\longrightarrow} Y\setminus W$ is an isomorphism.

2) By the Theorem of the Base of Néron–Severi, if $f$ is proper of finite type, then $N_1(X/Y)_{\mathbb Q}$ and $N^1(X/Y)_{\mathbb Q}$ are finite-dimensional vector spaces of the same dimension. This is actually more than you need, because even without the finite type assumption it is true that the intersection pairing $N_1(X/Y)_{\mathbb Q}\times N^1(X/Y)_{\mathbb Q}\to {\mathbb Q}$ is non-degenerate.

share|improve this answer
    
Ah, thanks for 1). Regarding 2), I don't see how this tells me whether $C_i \equiv C_j$, even after tensoring with $\mathbb{Q}$. –  babubba Oct 29 '10 at 18:55
4  
One of your assumptions is that $\dim_{\mathbb R}N^1(X/Y)=1$. Then 2) implies that $\dim_{\mathbb R}N_1(X/Y)=1$ or equivalently $\dim_{\mathbb Q}N_1(X/Y)=1$. In addition, the cycle of an algebraic subvariety can never be $0$, so it follows that $aC_i≡bC_j$ for some $0\neq a,b\in \mathbb Z$. Now $C_i$ and $C_j$ are part of a tree, so taking the reduced cycle that connects them, say $C$, one gets that $C_i\cdot C=C_j\cdot C =1$, so $a=b$ and you get that $C_i\equiv C_j$ over $\mathbb Q$. –  Sándor Kovács Oct 29 '10 at 20:10
    
great, thanks for that! Can I ask why at the end you write $C_1 \equiv C_2$ over Q? Doesn't your argument imply that the two curves are numerically equivalent even over Z? –  babubba Oct 29 '10 at 21:26
    
Actually, you are right. I was worried about torsion, but since you only care about numerical equivalence, you get it over $\mathbb Z$. –  Sándor Kovács Oct 29 '10 at 21:42
    
excellent, thank you very much. –  babubba Oct 29 '10 at 22:06
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.