Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This is essentially equivalent to this question by Simon Thomas. Let $G=\langle X\rangle$ be a finitely generated group, $b_n$ be the number of elements in the ball of radius $n$ in the Cayley graph.

1) Is it possible that the limit $\lim \frac{b_{n+1}}{b_n}$ does not exist?

2) Suppose that for every constant $\epsilon>0$ there exists an $n$ such that $\frac{b_{n+1}}{b_n}\le 1+\epsilon$. Does it imply that $\lim \frac{b_{n+1}}{b_n}=1$?

Note that the condition of 2) implies that the group is amenable and one can take balls as Foelner sets (which would contradict a statement in de la Harpe's book).

Update: The first part has been asked and answered already before (see Andreas' answer below). About 2): here is a stronger question. Suppose that an amenable group $G$ is finitely presented. Are there constants $\epsilon>0, N$ depending only on the lengths of the defining relations so that if $\frac{b_{n+1}}{b_n}\le 1+\epsilon$ for some $n>N$, then the limit above exists and is equal to 1? This is similar to a statement proved by Shalom and Tao about polynomial growth, but for groups of subexponential growth.

share|improve this question
    
I'm voting to close this as a duplicate. –  HJRW Oct 28 '10 at 16:11
    
A post on meta.MO would probably drum up the necessary votes. –  HJRW Oct 28 '10 at 17:20
    
Ah, yes, your new question is indeed presumably not a duplicate! I don't know if I can undo my vote, but I'll try... –  HJRW Oct 28 '10 at 23:38

1 Answer 1

Both questions have been asked before. The answer to Question 1 is negative, see here. Question 2 appeared just some hours ago here.

share|improve this answer
    
Yes, I did not know that (the first question). Thanks! –  Mark Sapir Oct 28 '10 at 16:24
    
@Andreas: Question 2 is not exactly the same as Simon's. It might be possible that if for some $n$ $b_{n+1}/b_n<1+\epsilon$ for some very small (universal constant, depending on the presentation) $\epsilon$, then the limit exists and is equal to 1. That is why I formulated it this way. The answer could be different for finitely presented and infinitely presented groups. –  Mark Sapir Oct 28 '10 at 16:41
    
I have updated the question. –  Mark Sapir Oct 28 '10 at 17:36

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.