MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top


i'm studying the book "Conformal Mapping: Method and Applications" from Schinzinger and more precisely the chapter 6 concerning non-planar field. In section 6.1.3 the author proposes to solve a cylindrical laplace equation by solving a cartesian laplace equation via a conformal mapping of the polar plane.

I've joined the concerned pages.

At one point he says $\phi(u,\zeta)$ (the potential in the cartesian coordinates) verifies the cylindrical laplace equation, which i think is wrong and if it really so, the whole demonstration fails.

can somebody verify this? It is of great concern since It is the only book to speek about those kind of mapping.


share|cite|improve this question
Google Books will also show the relevant pages:… – Dylan Thurston Oct 24 '10 at 14:40
(pp. 193--196). – Dylan Thurston Oct 24 '10 at 14:41
Here is the link directly to p.193 at Google books: – mathphysicist Oct 25 '10 at 18:56

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.