MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Kodaira embedding theorem says that a positive line bundle is ample, i.e. high tensor powers are holomorphically embeddable into complex projective space of high dimension.

However, ampleness is not stable under blow-ups. Usually a replacement is to consider big line bundles, which is stable under blow-ups.

Is there an embedding theorem for big line bundles? One cannot hope that an embedding of high tensor powers of a big line bundle to be everywhere injective, but can we have injectivity almost everywhere?

Here's the precise question. Let $X$ be a complex compact manifold. Let $L$ be an ample line bundle over $X$. Let $f:Y\to X$ be a blow up, or series of blow ups. Is there some condition for the pullback $f^*L$ to be an embedding outside the exceptional locus of $f$?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 8 down vote accepted

If $X$ is normal, then the Iitaka fibration theorem implies that $L$ is big if and only if the rational map

$\phi_m \colon X \dashrightarrow \mathbb{P}H^0(X, L^{\otimes m})$

is birational onto its image for some $m >0$, see [Lazarsfeld, Positivity in Algebraic Geometry I, p. 139].

I guess this is the "embedding theorem for big line bundles" you are looking for.

Regarding your last question, since $L$ is ample by assumption and $f$ is an isomorphism outside its exceptional locus $E$, some power of $f^*L$ will surely give an embedding of $X \setminus E$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you very much. This is exactly what I'm looking for. – Colin Tan Oct 24 '10 at 10:18


Francesco has already mentioned the "embedding theorem for big line bundles" that you were probably looking for, but I would like to add that this is pretty much the definition of big.

An alternative point one could make is that according to Kodaira's Lemma "big=ample+effective", so a high power of a big divisor is very ample on the complement of an effective divisor.

As for your last question, if $f:Y\to X$ is any proper morphism and $\mathscr L$ is an ample line bundle on $X$, then if $g$ denotes the morphism(!) defined by the global sections of very high powers of $f^*\mathscr L$, then it follows that $f$ factors through $g$. In particular, then $g$ is an isomorphism to its image (hence an embedding) wherever $f$ is (if $f$ is not birational, then this "wherever" is the empty set).

share|cite|improve this answer
Can really $f$ be "any morphism"? Don't you implicitly assume that it is proper and birational? – ACL May 24 '11 at 7:38
It was assumed that $X$ is compact, so I did implicitly assumed that so is $Y$, which makes $f$ automatically proper. On the other hand, birational is not needed. – Sándor Kovács May 24 '11 at 19:25
But, if $f$ is finite, $f^*\mathscr L$ will be ample, and the image of the morphism defined by the global sections of very high powers will by $Y$, and not $X$... – ACL May 27 '11 at 18:04
@ACL: Fair enough. I edited the answer so the message is the same, but I think it is now correct. Thanks for the corrections. – Sándor Kovács May 27 '11 at 18:35

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.