Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm looking for examples of explicit resolutions of (projective) 3-folds over a field k (char 0), with isolated singularities, or at least with smooth singular locus. I've looked in various books and online, but the examples they present have only been for curves and surfaces, for which resolution of singularities is much less complicated. It would also be nice if the exceptional divisor were sufficiently nice, say, with smooth components that intersect transversally (or if the exceptional divisor were itself smooth).

Are there any well-known/easy examples in dimension 3? Because resolution quickly becomes complicated as dimension increases, I'd imagine that examples become harder to come by, although I'm sure many exist!

In general, I seem to not be very good at finding references/papers relevant to specific things I'm looking for. Search engines typically turn up a lot of irrelevant papers, and thumbing through a bunch of books seems time-inefficient. Search engines have turned up a few papers, but I suspect that I can do better than what I've found thus far.

I realize that adding this second part about looking for references may detract from the specific issue I have right now, but I'd rather get better at finding things than ask here when I can't find something.

share|improve this question
1  
As far as I know "the" reference on crepant resolutions of three-folds is the article by Bridgeland-King-Reid: arxiv.org/pdf/math/9908027 (A resolution is crepant when the pull back of the canonical bundle by the resolving map is the canonical bundle of the base.) It's been a long time since I read it, but both it and the articles it references should be helpful. –  Joel Fine Oct 19 '10 at 18:29
3  
Toric varieties give a large class of examples. –  Torsten Ekedahl Oct 19 '10 at 19:01
    
You can use the computer algebra package "Singular" to create a bunch of examples of your own. The resolution of ADE-singularities (the easiest examples) in dimension 3 are essentially the same as in dimension 2 and are probably not treated for that reason. To work out the resolution of an A_k-singularity (x^2+y^2+z^2+w^(k+1)) is a nice exercise. Several people tried to convince me that starting from dimension 3 in many applications (e.g. calculation of the hodge structure on the cohomology) it might be easier to work with the singular variety itself rather than pass to the resolution. –  Remke Kloosterman Oct 19 '10 at 19:32
add comment

2 Answers 2

What kind of examples are you looking for? I mean there are plenty of examples, just take an explicit singularity and start blowing up. What properties are you looking for? If you are looking for behavior that does not happen in low dimensions, then an interesting family of examples come from what is known as a small resolution, that is, a resolution where the exceptional set is not a divisor.

I believe the simplest example of a small resolution is given by a cone over $\mathbb P^1\times \mathbb P^1$. The resolution is given by blowing up the surface that is the cone over one of the ruling curves on $\mathbb P^1\times \mathbb P^1$. Since the (big) cone is smooth away from the vertex, this blow up will not do anything there and over the vertex it will have an exceptional curve which is isomorphic to $\mathbb P^1$ and really corresponds to points on the curve that gave the blown up surface. This has all the nice properties you asked for: the singular set and the exceptional set are both smooth, it's even an isolated singularity. And, of course, you could have blown up the singular point and get the entire $\mathbb P^1\times \mathbb P^1$ as the exceptional divisor. Some similar and more general examples are computed in this paper.

A similar example can be cooked up from resolving cones over products in general.

Perhaps the next example to consider is when the singular set is larger dimensional, but not simply because it is (say) a product of an isolated singularity with something else.

Yet another way to find many interesting examples is by quotients.

Or you could just try to take your favorite projective variety and project it to a smaller dimensional subspace and then try to resolve the singularity. Although this can get really messy really soon so you have to choose the starting variety carefully. (Dolgachev has a paper on general surjection surfaces or something like that with generalizations by Steenbrink and Doherty (two papers).)

share|improve this answer
    
This is a very clear, very nice example which can be drawn down, but unfortunately it is hardly ever explained in books without a toric picture. I knew this example and I never felt I understood clearly where the isolated exceptional curve was coming from till I read this. I would be interested to know if there is any text book which deals with examples of blow-ups and blow-downs and in particular explains in detail how to compute multiplicities without recurring to schemes language. It seems to be something that everyone knows but no one knows where they learned it from. –  Jesus Martinez Garcia Mar 19 '12 at 16:26
1  
Unfortunately I don't know any such references, but I agree that there should be one... –  Sándor Kovács Mar 19 '12 at 20:56
1  
Jesus, I added a reference –  Sándor Kovács Dec 15 '13 at 5:54
add comment

Almost the same example, arises from blowing up an ordinary double point on any threefold, since the tangent cone is then a cone over a rank 4 quadric, i.e. P^1xP^1. This blowup then introduces a copy of P^1xP^1 as exceptional locus. Then one can blow down either ruling and get a small resolution.

The interesting part here is how it illustrates the non uniqueness of the small resolution, as there is no preferred way to choose one of the two rulings. As Moishezon said, "suppose while your back is turned some devil comes and changes which way you blow down." This seems to be the first example of a "flop".

This geometry is already quite interesting in the case of a niodal cubic threefold in P^4. There blowing up the node is almost the same as projecting the cubic from the node into P^3. I.e. the projection is birational and well defined on the blowup, mapping the quaric exceptional locus onto a rank 4 quadric surface in P^3. However those lines in the tangent cone to the cubic at the node that actually lie in the cubic threefold, and which are parametrized by a genus 4 curve in P^3, blow down onto the genus 4 curve.

This reveals the original non small resolution of the nodal cubic as the blow up of P^3 along a canonical genus 4 curve, hence a rational variety. From this viewpoint, since the genus 4 curve meets each line on the unique quadric surface containing it 3 times, it seems Moishezon's criterion implies either family of lines can be blown down on the resulting smooth threefold.

This story is part of the original solution of the Luroth problem for threefolds in the paper of Clemens and Griffiths.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.