Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

It is well known that every stable sheaf on a K3 surface $S$ is simple but the contrary is not true. Moreover, if $M$ denotes the (coarse) moduli space of stable sheaves on $S$ with fixed Chern classes and $Spl$ the moduli space of simple sheaves on $S$ with the same Chern classes, $M$ is an open subscheme of $Spl$. Can there exist a component of $Spl$ not intersecting $M$ or is $M$ dense in $Spl$? What about the relation between semistable and simple sheaves? Is a simple sheaf on a K3 surface always semistable? If not, can you give me a counterexample?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 1 down vote accepted

$M(c_1, c_2)$ is not always dense in $Spl(c_1, c_2)$, in other words irreducible components of $Spl(c_1, c_2)$ not intersecting $M(c_1, c_2)$ may actually exist.

In fact, in his paper

"Moduli of simple rank-$2$ sheaves on $K3$-surfaces",

Manuscripta Math. 79 (1993), no. 3-4, 253–265,

Z. Qin constructs irreducible components of $Spl(c_1, c_2)$, for suitable values of $c_1$, $c_2$, in which no sheaf is stable. Moreover, he proves the following

Theorem. Let $X$ be a $K3$-surface. Assume that $(4c_2-c^2_1)>16$, and that $S$ is an irreducible component in $Spl(c_1,c_2)$ such that no sheaf in $S$ is stable. Then $S$ is birational to either ${\rm Hilb}^d(X)$ or $X\times{\rm Hilb}^{d-1}(X)$.

I did not check whether these components contain some strictly semistable sheaves.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.