Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is there a simple rule to check whether a pretzel link P(n_1,...,n_k) is a trivial link? I am interested in the 2-component case but every information would be helpful.

share|improve this question
3  
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretzel_link for those who, like me, didn't know what a pretzel link is. In general one should try to define jargon, or provide link to background material, when asking a question on MO. –  Willie Wong Oct 13 '10 at 19:26
    
Why specify to 2-components? Is there an easy way to tell whether a pretzel link has exactly two components? –  Willie Wong Oct 13 '10 at 19:30
add comment

2 Answers 2

up vote 6 down vote accepted

A pretzel link has as many components as the pretzel link with coefficients reduced $(\mod 2)$. So it will have two components if and only if there are precisely two even coefficients.

A conceptual classification is given by considering the 2-fold branched cover, or the $\pi$-orbifold, obtained by taking the orbifold quotient of the 2-fold branched cover. For pretzel links, the 2-fold branched cover is a connect sum of Seifert fibered spaces (this is more generally true for Montesinos links). Then a 2-component link is trivial if and only if the two-fold branched cover is $S^2\times S^1$. A theorem of Bonahon and Siebenmann classifies Seifert fibered orbifolds, so in principal you can classify pretzel links from their classification.

share|improve this answer
    
Ah, after you pointed it out in your first paragraph, it is actually completely obvious that it should be so. Thanks. –  Willie Wong Oct 13 '10 at 22:57
    
Thanks for your answer. Actually I was looking for something like an algorithm but that's interesting. –  Paolo Aceto Oct 14 '10 at 1:21
add comment

In principle, normal surface theory answers your question - it can detect if a link is split and can decide if a knot is unknotted. In practice, just draw your link in SnapPea. But neither if these could be called a "simple rule." You might look at Purcell's thesis work/early papers (eg "Volumes of highly twisted knots and links"), using hyperbolic geometry, to give a simple rule implying that a link is non-trivial.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.