MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is there a way to calculate the number of non-repeating digits that precede the periodic repeating portion of a decimal expansion? For example:

1/6 = 0.1666.... (there is 1 non repeating digit) **(Correction) 1/12 = 0.08333... (there are 2 non repeating digits) 7/12 = 0.58333....(there are 2 non repeating digits) 1/96 = 0.01041666..(there are 5 non repeating digits)

Do any forumulas exist for predicting the maximum length n, of the number of non repeating digits preceding the repeating portion?

I know that if the denominator of a fraction is n, the maximum length of the repeating periodic portion is n-1. Must also the length of the preceding portion before the cycle be n-1?

Thank you!

share|cite|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Qiaochu Yuan, Daniel Loughran, Yemon Choi, Stefan Kohl, Felipe Voloch Dec 2 '14 at 10:34

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave these specific reasons:

  • "This question does not appear to be about research level mathematics within the scope defined in the help center." – Qiaochu Yuan, Daniel Loughran, Felipe Voloch
  • "MathOverflow is for mathematicians to ask each other questions about their research. See Math.StackExchange to ask general questions in mathematics." – Yemon Choi, Stefan Kohl
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1/6 is 0.1666... ; 1/7 is 0.142857... – J. M. Oct 11 '10 at 1:53
Otherwise, this might be more suitable for – J. M. Oct 11 '10 at 1:54
1/6 = 0.16666...thanks for the correction – user9934 Oct 11 '10 at 1:59
That 1/11 is really 1/12. – Gerry Myerson Oct 11 '10 at 2:28
up vote 5 down vote accepted

When one writes an irreducible fraction $m/n$ as a periodic digit number all one does is to write


So the number of digits before the period is the maximum of the power of $2$ and $5$ in $n$, i.e. wirting $n=2^\alpha 5^\beta k$ with $k$ relatively prime to $10$, the number of digits before the period is $\max\{\alpha, \beta \}$.

I think that this will follow for free from the following lemma, whose proof is trivial:

Lemma: if gcd$(k,10) =1$ then $k$ has a multiple of the form $999...9$.

share|cite|improve this answer
So stated another way, the number of non-repeating decimals is equal to the number of times the denominator is divisible by either 5 or 2. For example, 1/12, 12 is divisible by 2, 2 times, and there are 2 non-repeating digits. 1/96, 96 is divisible by 2 - 5 times... Do you recommend a good number theory book that explains this in more depth? Thank you Nick! – user9934 Oct 11 '10 at 3:28

Suppose we deal with base $B\in\mathbb{Z}$. The trick is to consider the distinct primes that divide $B$. If $a/b$ is in lowest terms, then the prime factorization of $b$ can be sorted into primes that divide $B$ and primes that don't. If $b=uv$, where every prime dividing $u$ divides $B$ and no prime dividing $v$ divides $B$, then $u\mid B^n$ for some integer $n$, and $(v, B)=1$. Then in base $B$, the expansion of $a/b$ satisfies the following: (a) The smallest integer $n$ such that $u\mid B^n$ is the number of non-repeating digits that precede the periodic repeating portion; (b) The order of $B$ (mod $v$) - it exists since $(v,B)=1$ and theoretically divides $\phi(v)$ - is the length of the periodic repeating portion.

The special case where $B=10$ is what is usually used. In that case, the distinct primes dividing $B$ are $2$ and $5$. Thus $u=2^\alpha 5^\beta$ and the smallest $n$ such that $u\mid 10^n$ would be $\max\{\alpha,\beta\}$. So Nick S was right.

share|cite|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.