MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

My question is basically if it is possible to define an abelian category of $R$-modules for a ringed space $R$, without fixing the underlying topological space of $R$. In detail, I want to spacify the $2$-functor $\text{Mod} : \text{Bimod} \to \text{AbCat}$ (see n-cafe for the definition of this functor). But I don't want to fix a topological space $X$ and replace sets by sheaves on this $X$, but rather I would like to vary $X$ (without ignoring maps $X \to Y$ for $X \neq Y$). Thus $\text{Bimod}$ should be fibered over $\text{Top}$, and the fiber over $pt$ should become the usual $2$-category of bimodules. The question is motivated by the (unknown) characterization of abelian categories which arise as quasi-coherent modules on schemes, which suggests to vary the topological space (see also this related question).

Here is what I have done so far. In the end, you will see that it does not work properly, but perhaps you know how to fix this.

Denote by $\text{Sh}$ the category whose objects are pairs $(X,\mathcal{A})$, where $X$ is a topological space and $\mathcal{A}$ is an abelian sheaf on $X$. A morphism $(X,\mathcal{A}) \to (Y,\mathcal{B})$ consists of a map $f : X \to Y$ together with a morphism $f^{-1} \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$ in $\text{Sh}(Y)$. This is a monoidal category, the tensor product is $(X,\mathcal{A}) \otimes (Y,\mathcal{B}) = (X \times Y,p_X^{-1} \mathcal{A} \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}} p_Y^{-1} \mathcal{B})$ and the unit is $(pt,\mathbb{Z})$. The monoids in $\text{Sh}^{op}$ are precisely the ringed spaces. If $(X,\mathcal{O}_X)$ is such a ringed space, then the $(X,\mathcal{O}_X)$-modules turn out to be objects $(Y,\mathcal{A})$ together with a continuous map $a : Y \to X$ and a $a^{-1} \mathcal{O}_X$-module structure on $\mathcal{A}$. Voila, we have defined modules without fixing the space $X$.

If $R,S$ are ringed spaces, then there is an obvious definition of a $(R,S)$-bimodule $M$; it is a bimodule on some topological space which is endowed with two maps to the topological spaces of $R$ and $S$. Every such module defines a functor $ - \otimes M : \text{Mod}(R) \to \text{Mod}(S)$; the underlying topological space is a fibered product.

So basically this works. However, since there are topological spaces $X,Y$ such that there are no maps $X \to Y$ and also it is not clear at all how to add such maps, the above category $\text{Mod}(R)$ is not enriched over abelian groups and is far from being abelian. Remark that every fiber over some $X \in \text{Top}$ is an abelian category, namely the usual category of $R$-modules on $X$.

share|cite|improve this question
I think all my questions are answered (at least as far they can be answered) in the paper "The Eilenberg-Watts theorem over schemes" by Nyman, available online – Martin Brandenburg Nov 14 '10 at 23:59

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.