Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Hello!

Given a triangulated category, one can look for semiorthogonal decompositions into (simpler?) triangulated subcategories.

I'd like to know if there's a way to attack the opposite problem, i.e. to classify the ways two given triangulated categories can be composed to give a big triangulated category which decomposes semiorthogonally into the given ones. Does anybody know about this?

I hope this question isn't too vague.

Thank you!

share|improve this question
add comment

4 Answers 4

If $T = \langle A ,B\rangle$ is a semiorthogonal decomposition and $\alpha_\ast:A \to T$, $\beta_\ast:B \to T$ are the embedding functors then one can consider the functor $\beta^\ast\circ\alpha_\ast:A \to B$ (or its right adjoint $\alpha^!\circ\beta_\ast:B \to A$). This is called the gluing functor. Morally, the ways of gluing $A$ to $B$ are classified by gluing functors --- to each functor one should be able to associate a triangulated category $T$ with a s.o.d. into $A$ and $B$ for which the gluing functor is isomorphic to the given one. Because of the well-known problems with nonfunctoriality of the cone, one cannot hope to prove this precise statement. However, if everything has a DG-enhancement, one can.

Indeed, assume that $A = Hot(R)$, $B = Hot(S)$, where $R$ and $S$ are pretriangulated DG-algebras and assume that the functor $A \to B$ is realized by a $R-S$-bimodule $M$. Then one can consider a DG-algebra of the form $$ U = \left(\begin{array}{cc} R & 0 \cr M & S \end{array}\right). $$ Then $T := Hot(U)$ should give what you want.

share|improve this answer
    
Sasha, that looks great, thanks alot. Is there a reference for the details? –  Hanno Becker Oct 7 '10 at 20:35
    
I am afraid there is no reference. This is a folklore. –  Sasha Oct 8 '10 at 5:30
add comment

[Lidia Angeleri Hügel, Steffen Koenig, Qunhua Liu: On the uniqueness of stratifications of derived module categories] at http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.5301 (and other recent work by Koenig) should be relevant: this is Jordan-Hölder for (appropriate) triangulated categories.

share|improve this answer
    
This is very interesting, thank you! –  Hanno Becker Oct 7 '10 at 20:34
add comment

I'm not sure but Proposition 1.16 in the paper:

http://arxiv.org/pdf/0911.0172

by Iyama-Kato-Miyachi might be related to your question.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you, Yann! –  Hanno Becker Oct 7 '10 at 20:34
add comment

There is an article by Kuznetsov and Lunts which lifts the glueing of triangulated categories to differential graded categories: http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.6170.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.