Let $\Lambda$ denote the ring of symmetric functions in variables $x_1,x_2,\dots$ and with coefficients in $\mathbf{Q}$. Then $\Lambda$ is freely generated as an $\mathbf{Q}$-algebra by $p_1,p_2,\dots$, where $p_n$ denotes the $n$-th power sum function $x_1^n+x_2^n+\cdots$. Let $\Delta^+$ and $\Delta^{\times}$ denote the $\mathbf{Q}$-algebra maps $\Lambda\to\Lambda\otimes_{\mathbf{Q}}\Lambda$ determined by $\Delta^+(p_n)=1\otimes p_n + p_n\otimes 1$ and $\Delta^{\times}(p_n)=p_n\otimes p_n$ for all $n\geq 1$. Let $\mathbf{Q}_+$ denote the sub-semiring $\{a\in\mathbf{Q}| a\geq 0\}$ of $\mathbf{Q}$.
Consider the following properties on subsets $S$ of $\Lambda$:
$S$is a$\mathbf{Q}$-linear basis of$\Lambda$.- All finite sums and products of elements of $S$ are contained in the
$\mathbf{Q}_+$-linear span of $S$. (That is, the span is a sub-$\mathbf{Q}_+$-algebra.) - The subsets
$\Delta^+(S)$and$\Delta^{\times}(S)$of$\Lambda\otimes_{\mathbf{Q}}\Lambda$are contained in the$\mathbf{Q}_+$-linear span of$S\otimes S = \{s\otimes s' | s,s'\in S\}$. - For all $s,s'\in S$, the composition $s\circ s'$ is contained the
$\mathbf{Q}_+$-linear span of $S$, where $\circ$ denotes plethysm.
These properties are satisfied if $S$ is the set of Schur functions or the set of monomial symmetric functions, for example. But the Schur functions give a smaller example in the sense that
they're contained in the $\mathbf{Q}_+$-linear span of the monomial symmetric functions.
I have many imprecise questions about subsets $S$ satisfying these properties, but in the interest of fair play, I'll ask a yes/no one:
Are the Schur functions the smallest example? That is, if $S$ satisfies the properties above, does its
$\mathbf{Q}_+$-linear span contain all the Schur functions?
(Apologies if this is standard, but I don't know much about Schur functions. I didn't find anything about it in Macdonald's book, and rather than emailing random experts, it's more fun to ask it here.)

