Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In singular homology one of the first calculations you can make is $H_0(X)=H_0(pt)$ for path-connected $X$. This seems to be a property which does not follow from the axioms for a generalized homology theory. This raises the following question:

Assume $H_* : Top^2 \to Ab^\mathbb{N}$ is a homology theory. Thus we impose homotopy invariance, excision, the long exact sequence, the dimension axiom and if you wish also the disjoint union axiom. Is then $H_0(X)=H_0(pt)$ for every path-connected space $X$?

I believe that there is a counterexample. Of course this can't be homotopy equivalent to a CW-complex. And probably this is the reason why this question is not reasonable at all. It's just my curiosity.

share|improve this question
1  
So really your question is to produce such an H and a space X to evaluate it on. You'll of course need an H which is not invariant under weak homotopy equivalences, so singular homology is out. –  Chris Schommer-Pries Oct 6 '10 at 18:13
2  
Maybe you shouldn't say "generalized homology theory" if you want the dimension axiom. –  Tom Goodwillie Oct 6 '10 at 19:16
    
What is the Cech homology of the topologist's sine curve? –  Charles Rezk Oct 6 '10 at 23:55
    
@Charles It may depend which exact version of that space (TSC) you are thinking of.Essentially the usual TSC has the same Cech invariants as if the sin 1/x bit was omitted. Cech homology is a shape invariant and the usual variants of the TSC (thought of as being in the plane) have contractible open neighbourhoods. –  Tim Porter Oct 7 '10 at 6:06
2  
@Martin: Cech homology has at least three definitions: one is the inverse limit of homology groups over open covers (Aleksandrov–Cech homology), one takes values in pro-abelian groups, and one applies a derived version of the inverse limit functor to the chain complexes in the system of open covers (the version I was using). I'm not sure of a reference and I would have to check closely to see if it satisfies the other axioms. One has to define the relative Cech homology using a mapping cylinder so that the long exact sequence becomes a tautology. –  Tyler Lawson Oct 7 '10 at 14:08
show 4 more comments

2 Answers

Here is a candidate space for Cech homology. (which doesn't satisfy the disjoint union axiom, and so strictly speaking it's not a homology theory)

For any natural number n, let $X_n$ be the circular arc of radius 1 + 1/n centered at $( 1+1/n,0)$ and extending between angles $-\pi \leq \theta \leq (\pi - 1/n)$. Let $X$ be the union of these circles with the subspace topology, which is path connected.

Covering this space with sufficiently small disks (each $X_n$ needing to be covered by progressively smaller disks) gives a Cech nerve homotopy equivalent to a similar space where all but finitely many of the circular arcs have been closed up to circles. The zero'th homology of this cover is $\mathbb{Z}$ and the first homology is an infinite direct sum $\oplus_{n \geq N} \mathbb{Z}$. All other homology groups are zero.

As you decrease the size of the cover, you get a cofinal sequence of open covers inducing a decreasing sequence of abelian groups as N grows. There is a resulting exact sequence $$ 0 \to lim^1(\oplus_{n \geq N} \mathbb{Z}) \to \check{H}_0(X) \to lim^0(\mathbb{Z}) \to 0 $$ and the left-hand side is $(\prod \mathbb{Z}) / (\oplus \mathbb{Z}) \neq 0$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

I'm not sure exactly what Cech homology is, but I'll assume that something which may or may not be called Cech homology has the following properties:

It's a generalized homology theory.

It vanishes in negative dimensions.

It satisfies the dimension axiom (so it's a homology theory).

There's a natural map from singular to Cech that is part of a natural triangle, an exact sequence

$\dots \to Cech_{n+1}\to ?_n\to Sing_n\to Cech_n\to \dots$.

The map $Sing_0\to Cech_0$ is always surjective, so that $?_n$ vanishes for $n<0$.

The map $Sing_0(TSC)\to Cech_0(TSC)$ is not injective if TSC is the topologist's sine curve.

(End of list of assumed properties.)

Then $?$ is a generalized homology theory vanishing in negative dimensions and vanishing on a point (therefore on CW complexes) but not vanishing on the path-connected space that you get by attaching a suitable $1$-cell to TSC.

The direct sum of ? and singular will then do the job, because $?_0(TSC\cup cell)=?_0(TSC)\ne 0$

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.