Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am looking for a direct proof of the fact that, roughly speaking, if $S=S_0+A+M$ is an $L^2$ semimartingale, and $M$ (the martingale part) has the martingale representation property, then for any square integrable random variable in $\mathcal{F}_T$, $X=X_0 + \int_0 ^T K_t d S_t$ for some predictable process $K$ (this would be true via the beloved "complete market"/unique martingale measure scenario from financial math, but I am looking for a proof that avoids a change of measure). The filtration here could be the natural filtration of $S$, or maybe a bigger one. In any case, all the usual assumptions are supposed to hold.

In the process of trying, I ran into a problem I can't figure out (I am getting rusty). I'll post a simplified version, and, if there's interest, I'll go to the full-fledged version. Everything here is cadlag and square integrable.

Suppose we partition $[0,T]$ in $n$ equal subintervals, $\left[ t_j,t_{j+1} \right]$, $j=0, \ldots, n-1$ Suppose that, besides the semimartingale $S_0 + A + M$, we have a finite-variation predictable process $K$. I would like to show that $\int_0^T K_s dA_s - \sum_{j=1}^{n-1} E \left[ \int_{t_j}^{t_{j+1}} K_s d A_s \left| \mathcal{F}_{t_j} \right. \right]$ goes to zero (in $L^2$, say), as $n \rightarrow \infty$.

As I said, I am getting rusty, so I am not sure what additional assumptions would be necessary (a back of the envelope calculation convinced me that this should work for Brownian Motion with drift, but I'd hope it's much more general), as I suppose that something is missing here.

Thank you.

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

Hi,

I think you should have a look at Protter's book "Stochastic Integration and Differential Equations" in the $L^2$ case I think that there is a direct proof there of this fact.

Regards

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you. I have been looking at Philip's book (and Liptser-Shirayev's) but didn't find what I was looking for. I guess I'll try to dig deeper. –  Federico Oct 15 '10 at 17:16
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.