Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose $\pi$ and $\rho$ are cuspidal automorphic representations on $GL(n)$ and $GL(m)$ respectively. Then the L-function $L(s,\pi \times \rho)$ has a pole iff and $m=n$ and $\pi$ is isomorphic to the contragradient of $\rho$ by some twist. Does anyone know some reference containing the proof of this fact?

I checked Rankin-Selberg convolution paper by Jacquet-P.S-Shalika. It mentioned this result and said the proof would appear somewhere.

Many thanks.

share|improve this question
    
I'm also curious, but not so curious right now to pore through the literature. It seems that the J-PS-S paper was followed up by archimidean results by J (Contemp. Math.) and J-S (in the PS 60th bday volume). Perhaps these finish it off? Also, Cogdell's article "Analytic theory of L-functions for GL(n)" (on his webpage) has an exposition of this result. I don't know which of these or other articles is the definitive reference for this important result. –  Marty Oct 3 '10 at 18:41

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

It seems to be in the Cogdell-PS paper "Remarks on Rankin-Selberg Convolutions" in the Shalika volume, though I haven't read through it myself.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.