Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The string group $String(n)$ is by definition a 3-connected cover of $Spin(n)$. This definition determines the homotopy type of the string group.

[In a previous version of this question I screwed up the definition and caused some confusion, see the comments below.]

A common argument is saying that "the string group cannot be a Lie group because it has vanishing $\pi_3$". This is obviously not a complete argument because $(\mathbb{R},+)$ is a nice Lie group with vanishing $\pi_3$.

What is the correct statement about Lie group structures on the string group, and how does one prove it?

share|improve this question
    
Konrad -- unless $n\leq2$ there is no group at all satisfying the conditions of the posting. –  algori Sep 24 '10 at 7:29
    
@algori could you give a reference for this (or a sketch of an argument)? –  Michele Triestino Sep 24 '10 at 7:32
1  
Michele -- a covering group of a Lie group is a Lie group. So either the connected component of the unit is a torus of $\pi_3\neq 0$. I presume the author meant something else but I'm not sure what exactly. –  algori Sep 24 '10 at 7:37
    
... or $\pi_3\neq 0$. Argh! –  algori Sep 24 '10 at 7:45
    
thank you! you are right –  Michele Triestino Sep 24 '10 at 7:48

2 Answers 2

up vote 6 down vote accepted

The result is that a compact, connected simple Lie group $G$ has $\pi_3(G) = \mathbb{Z}$. Simple covering space or subgroups arguments should get you to $SO(n)$ which is all that matters. For that matter start with the 1-connected $Spin(n)$.

[OK, a short train ride later, now I'm home from work. To continue...]

The fibre of the 3-connected cover is a 2-type, and in the case of $Spin(n)$ this is a $K(\mathbb{Z},2)$, so at the very least, $String(n)$ can't be finite-dimensional. If one could construct a primitive[1] $PU(\mathcal{H})$-bundle on $Spin(n)$ whose Dixmier-Douady classs was the generator $\langle -,[-,]\rangle \in H^3(Spin(n))$, then you would have an infinite-dimensional Lie group model for $String(G)$ (here $\mathcal{H}$ is a infinite-dimensional separable Hilbert space, $PU(\mathcal{H})$ is then a smooth model for $K(\mathbb{Z},2)$).

([1] Primitive in the sense that for the group operations $G\times G\to G$ and $(-)^{-1}:G\to G$ there are bundle maps covering them.)

I don't know if this is possible or not, but I'm sure this idea has occurred to someone before, and since we haven't seen it, there might be a reason (well, I haven't seen it and everyone goes on about $String$ only being a topological group).

share|improve this answer
    
David -- re $pi_3(G)=\mathbf{Z}$: what about tori? –  algori Sep 24 '10 at 8:10
    
I'm only thinking about the definition of String proper. –  David Roberts Sep 24 '10 at 8:14
    
oh yes, it says "simple". Need to get some sleep. –  algori Sep 24 '10 at 8:18
    
David, can you complete your argument by explaining why a 2-type can't be finite-dimensional? –  Konrad Waldorf Sep 24 '10 at 9:02
    
Ok, it can't be finite-dimensional because it has cohomology in infintely many degrees, see Daniel's answer below. –  Konrad Waldorf Sep 24 '10 at 12:50

As David Roberts is saying it's conceivable the string group could be represented by an infinite dimension manifold. I'm totally agnostic on that, but as I interpret the question it's asking why it's not equivalent(as an H-space?) to a non-compact finite dimensional Lie group(David Robert also explains that for a compact simply connected Lie group we always have $\pi_3$ non vanishing). I think though the underlying space has cohomology in infinitely many dimensions. Let me illustrate this in the case of String(3). So we have a Serre spectral sequence for the fibration $K(Z,2)\mapsto String(3) \mapsto S^3$. Now thinking of Z[x] as the cohomology ring of K(Z,2), the differential has to be $d:x \mapsto e$, the generator for the cohomology of $S^3$. So using the Leibnitz rule, $x^2\mapsto 2x\otimes e$, $x^3 \mapsto 3x^2\otimes e$... etc. This means that $H^5(String(3)= Z/2Z$, H^7(String(3))=Z/3Z... etc

share|improve this answer
    
Daniel, sorry for this stupid question, can you specify a reference for the cohomology of $K(\mathbb{Z},2)$? If it really has cohomology in infinitely many degrees, than one can use David's argument above to show that $String(n)$ cannot be finite-dimensional for all $n$! –  Konrad Waldorf Sep 24 '10 at 12:39
3  
$K(\mathbb{Z},2)$ is $\mathbb{CP}^\infty$, and its cohomology is a polynomial algebra on a generator in degree 2; most algebraic topology texts should cover this. –  Tyler Lawson Sep 24 '10 at 12:46
    
Aha, thanks! –  Konrad Waldorf Sep 24 '10 at 12:56
    
Well it just seemed a little subtle because the string group is only defined up to H-space equivalence so it seemed possible that you could have an infinite manifold that is homotopy equivalent to a f.d. one. –  Daniel Pomerleano Sep 24 '10 at 17:06

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.