Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm currently working with the following two situations:

  1. $\mathbb A$ is a monoidal category, $\mathbb B$ is an $\mathbb A$-enriched monoidal category, and $\mathbb C$ is a $\mathbb B$-enriched category (and ${\mathbb A}\ncong {\mathbb B}$, ${\mathbb B}\ncong {\mathbb C}$, ${\mathbb A}\ncong {\mathbb C}$).

  2. $\mathbb V$ and $\mathbb W$ are monoidal categories, $v$ is a $\mathbb V$-enriched category, $w$ is a $\mathbb W$-enriched category, and there is a monoidal functor $F:{\mathbb V}\to{\mathbb W}$.

I haven't been able to find much in Kelly's Basic Concepts of Enriched Category Theory, but surely others have come across these two situations before; there are lots of easy results (like, the image of $v$ under $F$ is a $\mathbb W$-enriched category) which must have been known for ages. Are there terms for the situations above? That would help me search the literature. If not, even just one paper on either of these cases with a bibliography would be a good foothold.

So far everything I've found on enriched category theory seems to focus on the case where there's only one enriching category in which all of the enriched categories are enriched (or the self-enrichment case where $\mathbb D$ is isomorphic to a $\mathbb D$-enriched category).

Thank you!

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

One key phrase to look for is "change of base" (which of course means many other things, but category theorists have also used it to mean your #2). I don't know a canonical reference at a commonly used level of generality, but all these facts are certainly folklore in categorical circles.

Your #1 might be called "iterated enrichment," and in good situations, it is a special case of #2. If A is a monoidal category and B is a monoidal A-category, then (the underlying ordinary category of) B is monoidal, and we have a (lax) monoidal functor B→A given by the A-valued $\underline{Hom}(I,-)$ where I is the unit object of B. In particular, every B-enriched category becomes an A-enriched category in a canonical way. If B is cocomplete, then this functor has a left adjoint (given by copowers of I) which is (automatically) colax monoidal, and strong monoidal if B is closed. Conversely, given a lax monoidal functor R:B→A where B is closed and hence a B-enriched category, then B becomes A-enriched according to #2.

Edit: I remembered one reference that I like: Geoff Cruttwell's thesis.

share|improve this answer
Thanks Mike! Sadly the phrase "change of base" means (as you mention) so many things that it isn't really workable as a search phrase. I like the term "iterated enrichment" quite a bit, and will adopt it immediately. As you guessed, the two scenarios are related, but unfortunately I can't assume that $\mathbb B$ is self-enriched (closed). I voted your answer up, but I'm going to hold off on accepting an answer in order to see if somebody can come up with a citation of some sort. –  Adam Sep 27 '10 at 4:28
I remembered one reference. –  Mike Shulman Sep 27 '10 at 20:59
I think that Eilenberg, S. & Kelly, G.M. Closed categories in: Proceedings of the Conference on Categorical Algebra. (La Jolla, 1965) is the earliest reference treating change of base in the sense you mention. –  Daniel Schäppi Mar 11 '12 at 3:16

The thesis of Dominic Verity treats base change in a very abstract 2-categorical setting - looks like a lot of specialization is necessary until you arrive at the sort of situation sketched in the question.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.