Welcome to MathOverflow

Question

1

In R.C.Penner "Decorated Teichmuller theory of boarded surface", on Page 7 and 8, it says that (without proof) the Teichmuller space of surface with $s$ labelled punctures and $r$ labelled boundary components and one marked point on each boundary is homeomorphic to an open ball of dimension $6g-6+2s+4r$, where is the proof of that?I never see the version of T space that has marked points on the boundary, is also that they all homeomorphic to a ball like usual? Is there any reference about this?Thank you!

edited Sep 23 2010 at 22:47

asked Sep 23 2010 at 6:10

Hao
9●2

Kevin Lin · Answer 1 · 2010-09-23 07:19:22Z UTC

2

Just look up Teichmuller theory on the Internet; there are plenty of references. For example see these notes by Curtis McMullen.

answered Sep 23 2010 at 7:19

Kevin Lin
13k●2●34●115

@Kevin, I know Teichmuller space, but I don't see the one could have marked points on the boundary, what's the proof that it is a ball? – Hao Sep 23 2010 at 10:01

1

Ordinary Teichmüller space is (6g-6)-dimensional. Each puncture contributes 2 dimensions, so that accounts for the 2s. A boundary circle comes from removing a disc: a disc has a center point (2 dimensions) and a radius (1 dimension). A marked point on a boundary circle contributes 1 more dimension. 4r = (2+1+1)r. – Kevin Lin Sep 23 2010 at 13:42

@Kevin, that is the dimension, but why topologically it is a ball?Any proof? – Hao Sep 23 2010 at 21:32

Take the proof you know for when there is no boundary, and then add boundary and marked points. It's the same proof. – Ryan Budney Sep 24 2010 at 2:48

A question in R.C.Penner’s paper about Teichmuller space

Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)

1 Answer

You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.