Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A certain set $\cal P$ of primes is defined by two assumedly independent conditions:

The first condition on a prime $p$ can be characterized in terms of the type of splitting of $p$ in certain Galois extensions of $\Bbb Q$. The natural density of the bigger set ${\cal P}^\prime$ of primes satisfying this condition can be estimated under the usual independence hypotheses using Cebotarev's theorem.

Let $v$ be a non-zero vector in ${\Bbb Z}^2$. For each $p\in{\cal P}^\prime$ a certain $1$-dimensional subspace $V_p\subset({\Bbb Z}/p{\Bbb Z})^2$ is defined. The second condition is then that $p\in{\cal P}$ if and only if $v\bmod p\in V_p$.

Thus, a prime $p\in{\cal P}^\prime$ is actually in $\cal P$ with "probability" $c_p=\frac1{p+1}$.

I am tempted to consider the quantity $$ \delta({\cal P})=\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac {\sum_{p\in{\cal P}^\prime_n}\ c_p} {|\hbox{primes $\leq n$}|} $$ where ${\cal P}^\prime_n={\cal P}^\prime\cap\[1,\ldots,n\]$. What is unclear to me is if this may be taken as a good estimate (or "guess") of the natural density of $\cal P$ or not.

share|improve this question
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.