Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $\mathcal C$ and $\mathcal D$ be categories with suitable limits and colimits for the following discussion. Is it possible to re-interpret, or "re-seat" a monad $T : \mathcal C \to \mathcal C$ as a monad over $\mathcal D$? When $T$ is finitary, I know at least one way to do this. Compute the Kleisli category $\mathcal C_T$ and consider $(\mathcal C_T)^{op}$ as a Lawvere theory. Then models of $(\mathcal C_T)^{op}$ on $\mathcal C$ are the same as $T$-algebras. If we then consider models of $(\mathcal C_T)^{op}$ on $\mathcal D$, we have a canonical, monadic forgetful functor $[(\mathcal C_T)^{op},\mathcal D] \to \mathcal D$ from which we can build a new finitary monad $T' : \mathcal D \to \mathcal D$. My question is as follows.

Is there an direct way to obtain $T'$ from $T$ (i.e. that doesn't go via the Lawvere theory)? If so, can it be extended to work for arbitrary monads?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 7 down vote accepted

I like the question, Aleks - and I like the term "re-seating".

Yes, there is a direct way, at least in suitable circumstances. First suppose that we're beginning with a finitary monad $T$ on $\text{Set}$. For each set $X$, we have $$ T(X) = \int^n T(n) \times X^n $$ where the coend is over the category of finite sets. (This is essentially the definition of finitariness, in disguise. If you haven't seen this before, think of $T(n)$ as the set of $n$-ary operations in the theory $T$.) The symbol $\times$ is of course product, but it could also be interpreted as copower: $T(n) \times X^n$ is a copower of the object $X^n$ of $\text{Set}$.

Now take a category $\mathcal{D}$ with suitable colimits. For $Y \in \mathcal{D}$, put $$ T'(Y) = \int^n T(n) \times Y^n $$ where again the coend is over the category of finite sets, and $\times$ is copower. (We can no longer interpret $\times$ as product, because $T(n)$ and $Y^n$ belong to different categories.) You can give $T'$ the structure of a monad, at least under mild assumptions on the behaviour of colimits in $\mathcal{D}$. That's the same monad $T'$ you'd get if you followed the kind of procedure you describe.

Incidentally, I don't think your description of the procedure is quite right. If, for example, $\mathcal{C} = \text{Set}$, then $(\mathcal{C}_T)^\text{op}$ is not the Lawvere theory of $T$. The Lawvere theory is the full subcategory of $(\mathcal{C}_T)^\text{op}$ consisting of just the (free algebras on) finite sets.

I think the coend formula for re-seating should work when $\mathcal{C}$ is an arbitrary locally finitely presentable category, not necessarily $\text{Set}$. You'd have to replace the category of finite sets by the category $\mathcal{C}_{\text{fp}}$ of finitely presentable objects of $\mathcal{C}$. And you'd need $\mathcal{C}_{\text{fp}}$ to act on $\mathcal{D}$, so that the copower defining $T'$ made sense.

Generalizing in a different direction, there's probably nothing special about finitariness: you could do it with any old rank. But I suspect you do need the monad to have rank in order to re-seat a monad in the kind of way I'm suggesting. The category of finite (or suitably small) sets provides a bridge between $\mathcal{C}$ and $\mathcal{D}$, and that's what enables the monad to be re-seated.

share|improve this answer
Thanks Tom! I'd just about given up on that one. –  Aleks Kissinger Dec 4 '11 at 23:09
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.