The generation function of the GromowWitten invariants (with descendants) of the point is known to be KontsevichWitten taufunction of KdV, partition functions of $P^1$ and equivariant $P^1$ are known to be taufunctions of extended Toda and 2Toda respectively. Are there any other manifolds (except of orbifolds made of mentioned previously manifolds ) for which generation functions of GW invariants are identified with taufunctions of some integrable hierarchy?

Short answer: essentially, the point and $P^1$ are the only spaces where the GW generating function is a taufunction. However, you mentioned two variations on this spaces: equivariant orbifold versions. And there are other variations that go a bit further  twisted and relative invariants, and, a little wilder, LandauGinzburg theory. But in all cases, everything seems to be a reduction of either the KP hierarchy or the 2Today hierarchy. Twisted InvariantsLet $L_i$ be some line bundles on $X$, and let $B$ be the total space of $\oplus L_i$. The GW theory of $B$ doesn't make sense since it's not compact, and so neither will $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}(B, \beta)$, but we can take a $\mathbb{C}^*$ on $B$ that fixes $X$ and just acts on the fibers, and then use localization on $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}(B, \beta)$. The fixed point locus will be $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}(X, \beta)$, but the invariants will be different because of extra terms coming from the euler class of the normal bundle. We call and so it will make sense to integrate, and we define these to be $GW(B)$, and call them twisted invariants of $X$. A GrothendieckRiemannRoch calculation begun by Mumford and extended and expanded by FaberPandharipande and CoatesGivental will reduce $GW(B)$ to $GW(X)$, but in a messy way that would for instance change the invariants, and certainly change around the integrable hierarchy. So, for instance, in the case of a point, we'll just get integrals over $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}$, the normal bundle will essentially be copies of the Hodge bundle, and so we'll get $\lambda$ classes appearing in our integrals along with the usual $\psi$ classes: these are called Hodge integrals. In the case that there is just one line bundle (so $B=\mathbb{C}$, the integral will be linear in the $\lambda$ classes, and will be the integral appearing in the ELSV formula. Kazarian shows that the resulting GW theory satisfies the KP hierarchy. The case with three line bundles ($B=\mathbb{C}^3$) is the case covered by the topological vertex. As far as I know, there is no known integrable hierarchy satisfying the whole thing. But Zhou has shown that certain specializations lead to KP and 2Toda type equations. Similarly, we can twist the GW theory of $\mathbb{P}^1$ and hope to get integrable hierarchies here. Brini has made some progress here for the direct sum of two line bundles, so that $B$ is a threefold. In particular, for the resolved conifold (the total space of $\mathcal{O}(1)\oplus\mathcal{O}(1)$, he gets connections with the AblowitzLadik hierarchy, apparently some reduction of 2Toda. Relative InvariantsAnother variation we can play is to use relative invariants, working relative to a divisor. In dimension zero this doesn't work, but we can work relative to 0 and $\infty$ on $\mathbb{P}^1$. Okounkov and Pandharipande have shown that this flavor also satisfies some 2Toda type hierarchy. In the paper of Zhou mentioned above, he also sets up certain relative generating functions for toric varieties that satisfy KP and 2Toda hierarchies. LandauGinzburgIn another direction, if we move slightly away from GW theory we can get more interesting examples. Fan, Jarvis and Ruan have recently finished rigorously constructing a LandauGinzburg Amodel  essentially, a GromovWitten theory for hypersurface singularities. These theories have a central charge that acts as a dimension. The central charge 0 case has an ADE classification. Witten conjectured that the theory of these should satisfy the corresponding KacWakimoto / DrinfeldSokolov reduction of the KP hierarchy. Note that for $A_1$, this is the GromovWitten theory of a point, and the usual KdV hierarchy. In the $A_r$ case, the analytic machinery of FJR is not needed to define the theory, and it goes under the name $r$spin curves  essentially, we're doing integrals over the moduli space of orbifold curves with an chosen $r$th root of the canonical bundle. Witten's conjecture was proven here by Faber, Shadrin and Zvonkine. FJRW have recently proven the D and E cases. 

