# Symmetries of the Julia sets for $z^2+c$

The julia set seems to have symmetries roughly corresponding to translation, rotation and scaling.

In the following image

• You can see the horizontal translation, which leaves the extremal left and right endpoints fixed is a symmetry.
• The 21-fold rotational symmetry about any one of the 'whorls' is visible also - (I think that the number 21 corresponds to the denominator of the mandelbrot bulb the julia set comes from but I don't yet know how to compute this).
• There is also a twofold rotation about the center (and any other part similar to it)
• The scales are more difficult to describe and I don't think I have found them all so I will just avoid going into detail on this unless someone would like me to do so.

Do these have a mathematical interpretation, for example as automorphisms of the Julia set in some appropriately understood sense? Or is there some other way to describe these kinds of symmetries in mathematical terms?

Thank you.

-
Those are members of the self-homeomorphism group of the Julia set. They are probably also members of the self-lipeomorphism group, consisting of diffeomorphisms that are Lipschitz continuous, but I'm not sure about that. I keep thinking the Julia set has to be homeomorphic to something with a much simpler description, but I can't come up with anything. – Ricky Demer Sep 9 '10 at 23:19
This might be relevant: front.math.ucdavis.edu/0202.5001 – Ian Agol Sep 10 '10 at 2:01
muad, if you're there, could you fix the broken link, please? – Todd Trimble Jun 25 '14 at 14:41

Many Julia sets are known to be quasi-self-similar. This means that there is a quasi-conformal map (thus of bounded distortion) which maps parts of the Julia set to the whole. In fact, given any compact subset $K$ of a Julia set $J$, there is a finite iterate of $f_c(z) = z^2+c$ such that $K=J$. So $J$ is similar to essentially all parts of itself, up to some amount of distortion. There are all sorts of theorems (based on Yoccoz puzzles, amongst other things) which help quantify the various amounts of distortion you get.

A good place to start (if you are serious about understanding how this really works!) is

ADRIEN DOUADY. JOHN HAMAL HUBBARD. On the dynamics of polynomial-like mappings. Annales scientifiques de l'É.N.S. 4e série, tome 18, no 2 (1985).

-

Yes, there is an explanation, but not in all cases.

Rotational symmetries of polynomial Julia sets are explained in the paper MR0951972. For the case of rational functions, see also MR1092156. And also MR1625697 about translational symmetries. And several papers of Beardon, titled Symmetries of Julia sets.

-