-3

5 
-1: The title is obnoxious and the questioner didn't put even minimal effort into formulating the question. – Victor Protsak Sep 9 2010 at 19:38
Knew it reminded me of something. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Colossus – Will Jagy Sep 9 2010 at 21:21

closed as not a real question by Victor Protsak, Andrew Stacey, Theo Johnson-Freyd, Bill Johnson, S. Carnahan Sep 10 2010 at 0:29

2 Answers

0

This MO question contains a nice version for groups and half a Chinese remainder theorem (at most) for general algebraic structures.

link|flag
3

There is a chapter in the award-winning book The Mathematical Experience by Philip J. Davis and Reuben Hersh which can serve as an answer to this question. Its title is

"The Drive to Generality and Abstraction. The Chinese Remainder Theorem: A Case Study"

See (if you can)

http://books.google.com/books?id=lMdz84dWNnAC&pg=PA187&lpg=PA187&dq=Chinese+Remainder+Theorem+The+Mathematical+Experience&source=bl&ots=Bq8ZMmP8u3&sig=yd0hbM_VZR9TxzcFZWHth87obng&hl=en&ei=3i6JTM2uNorG8wTmnvHgDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCUQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q&f=false

It is an interesting take in part because Davis and Hersh are not algebraists or number theorists. Note that they do not include the result on pairwise comaximal ideals in a commutative ring, which is the most general result that I have in mind when I say "Chinese Remainder Theorem". On the other hand, they do discuss the interpretation of weak approximation as a sort of CRT. (In my view this is a good analogy but not precisely right: when both results apply, CRT has a stronger conclusion than weak approximation.)

link|flag

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.