Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $X$ be a finite CW-complex with only even cells $x_1,\ldots, x_k$ and let $Y$ be the complex obtained by attaching one more even cell to $X$, call it $y$. Assume both $X$ and $Y$ are connected. The quotient complex $Y^n/X^n$ has the cell structure with one cell for each product of cells $e_1\times\cdots\times e_n$ where the $e_i$ are either equal to $x_i$ or $y$ and at least one $e_i$ is equal to $y$. I want to say that this amounts to a wedge of products of spheres each product of spheres depending on how many copies of $y$ there is in that cell. Is this correct?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Suppose Y is obtained by attaching a zero-cell, so $Y = X \cup \{\ast\}$. Then $Y^2$ is $$(X \times X) \cup (X \times \{\ast\}) \cup (\{\ast\} \times X) \cup (\{\ast\} \times \{\ast\})$$ and so $Y^2/X^2$ is homeomorphic to $$ \{\ast\} \cup X \cup X \cup \{\ast\}. $$ This can be arbitrarily complicated depending on X.

ADDENDUM: By request, a connected example is the inclusion $\mathbb{CP}^1 \subset \mathbb{CP}^2$. The quotient $Y^2/X^2$, in this case, has a nonzero cohomology operation $Sq^2$ from H6 to H8 with ℤ/2-coefficients, and there is no wedge of products of spheres that can have this cohomology. (You should work out the details.)

share|improve this answer
    
What if I assume that both $X$ and $Y$ are connected? –  Richard Aug 30 '10 at 17:01
    
@Richard: I think you get the same problem if you attach something other than a 0-cell. If $y$ is the new cell, the quotient looks like $\{\ast\}\cup (X\times y)\cup (y\times X)\cup (y\times y)$. –  Anton Geraschenko Aug 30 '10 at 18:15
    
@Anton: Exactly. The sets $(X \times y)$ etc produce suspensions of X sitting inside this quotient space. Unfortunately in order to show that these don't decompose, up to homotopy equivalence, as wedges of products of spheres you need at least a little machinery. –  Tyler Lawson Aug 30 '10 at 18:44
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.