MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The "Littlewood Problem" in the title asks for a characterization of finite sequences

n1< ...< nk of integers such that zn1+zn2+...+znk≠0 for any complex number z of unit modulus.

Does anybody know about the current status of this problem?

Some Background

1)I came to know this Littlewood Problem through the paper of Casazza & Kalton,

2)For k=2,3,4, by some simple geometric argument, a complete characterization can be easily obtained. I wonder if such a result has already appeared in the literature.

3)Furthermore, I wonder if at least for the case of k=5, (or indeed, similarly for any k),the following is true? And if it is, whether it is in the literature somewhere.

Suppose that for some complex number z of unit modulus and some integers n1< ...< n5,


then either zn1,zn2,..,zn5 are evenly distributed on the unite circle (i.e., they look like the 5th roots of unit after a certain rotation is applied to each) or three pounts among zn1,zn2,..,zn5 are evenly distributed on the unite circle.

share|cite|improve this question

For every $\alpha$, $\pi/3\le\alpha\le\pi$, there is a $\beta$ such that $1+e(\alpha)+e(-\alpha)+e(\beta)+e(-\beta)=0$, where I write $e(x)$ for $e^{2\pi ix}$. Moreover, $\beta$ depends continuously on $\alpha$, so there will be infinitely many $\alpha$ such that $\beta/\alpha$ is rational, say, $\beta/\alpha=m/n$. Let $z=e(\alpha/n)$. Then $z^0+z^n+z^{-n}+z^m+z^{-m}=0$, and in general these numbers will not be vertices of a regular pentagon, nor include vertices of an equilateral triangle. This is in (negative) answer to part 3) of the question, case $k=5$, and surely the answer is negative as well for any $k\ge5$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks a lot for Gerry's answer. Sorry I do not know how to make this a comment(in stead of an answer), nor how to formally "accept" Gerry's answer. In view of Gerry's answer, the complete solution of the problem looks much less likely. I am still(even more eagerly) looking for any possible reference about the status of the said problem. Thanks again! – user8760 Aug 24 '10 at 15:37

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.