Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

There is a well-known morphism $S_4\to S_3$, obtained by having $S_4$ act on the three partitions of $4$ objects into $2+2$. Similarly, given any $n$, one can devise a morphism $S_n\to S_k$ for some $k$ by having $S_n$ act on the partitions of $n$ objects into $n_1+n_2+\ldots+n_\ell$. One can further endow some or all of the element of the partition with an order, for example with $\ell=1$ one has $S_n$ acting on the set of ordered sequences of size $n$, and gets the left action of $S_n$ on itself, which is a morphism $S_n\to S_{n!}$ (the largest one that is irreducible).

Is that, are something close to that, the complete list of all morphisms $S_n\to S_k$ (up to conjugacy, of course)? I assume the answer is well-known.

Edit: the question was really naive, but I would like to know if some general information are nevertheless available on the Burnside ring of $S_n$ (which encodes the permutation representations of a finite group, but this is almost all I know).

share|improve this question
3  
A map $S_n \to S_k$ is equivalent to an index $k$ subgroup of $S_n$, which is equivalent to finding a group of order $n!/k$ which acts on $n$ objects. Classifying all pairs (finite group, finite set on which it acts) is basically hopeless, and thus so is your question. One might be able to give a good classification in the case that $k$ is not too much larger than $n$. –  David Speyer Aug 23 '10 at 15:17
1  
The statement of the question isn't entirely clear to me (for instance, how $k$ and $\ell$ are related). Aside from that, it's important to keep in mind that for $n \geq 5$, the alternating group is a simple nonabelian group of index 2 in $S_n$. In that case homomorphisms from $S_n$ have few possible kernels. –  Jim Humphreys Aug 23 '10 at 18:53
1  
@David Speyer: it is even worse. A map Sn to Sk is actually a multi-set of conjugacy classes of subgroups whose index totals to k. Only the "irreducible" (transitive) maps correspond to a single subgroup. –  Jack Schmidt Aug 24 '10 at 1:19
2  
The maximal subgroups of Sk that are isomorphic to Sn are classified, and are all natural actions of Sn on some construction on n points that ends up giving k points. Maximal subgroups is a long way from arbitrary group homomorphisms, so let me know if you want references for this much more modest classification. –  Jack Schmidt Aug 24 '10 at 1:20
    
@David Speyer: ok, I understand my question was really naive. @Jim: $k$ is the number of partitions corresponding to the given partition of unity (for example if $n=5,\ell=2$ and $n_1=2$, $n_2=3$ then $k=10$). In particular, except for a few case like $S_4\to S_3$, $k>n$ and the kernels are trivial. @Jack Schmidt: I would like a reference for this, thanks. –  Benoît Kloeckner Aug 24 '10 at 6:45
add comment

1 Answer 1

Bret Benesh and Ben Newton determined all pairs $(m,n)$ such that $S_m$ contains a maximal subgroup isomorphic to $S_n$. They are either $(n+1,n)$ with the obvious inclusion (or mapping $S_5$ into the image of a point stabilizer under the outer automorphism of $S_6$); $(\binom{n}{k},n)$, coming from the action of $S_n$ on the subsets of $k$ elements of $\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$; and $((kr)!/(r!)^k k!, kr)$ with $1\lt k,r$, with $S_{kr}$ acting on the the right cosets of a maximal subgroups of the wreath product $S_k\wr S_r$. This appears in A classification of certain maximal subgroups of symmetric groups, J. Algebra 304 (no. 2) pp. 1108-1113, MR2265507.

Bret later also determined all pairs $(m,n)$ such that $S_m$ has a maximal subgroup isomorphic to $A_n$; such that $A_m$ has a maximal subgroup isomorphic to $S_n$; and such that $A_m$ has a maximal subgroup isomorphic to $A_n$. This appears in the book Computational Group Theory and the Theory of Groups, Contemporary Mathematics 470 (L-C Kappe, R. F. Morse, and me as editors), AMS 2008; the paper is A classification of certain maximal subgroups of alternating groups, pp. 21-26, MR2478411.

As pointed out by Jack, this does exhaust all possible embeddings of $S_n$ into $S_k$ (presumably you are okay with the maps that are not embeddings...)

share|improve this answer
    
I don't quite understand your last sentence: most homomorphism between symmetric groups are embeddings of $S_n$ or $A_n$, due to the simplicity of the latter when $n\geqslant 5$. Moreover, Jack's point is precisely that there are many embeddings whose image is not maximal, no? –  Benoît Kloeckner Aug 24 '10 at 14:31
    
@Benoît: I agree with the first half of your comment, but in the second half you probably mean "whose image is not transitive". –  j.p. Aug 24 '10 at 15:41
1  
@Benoit: the attempt at a joke is merely that you asked about all morphisms, but it is really only the embeddings that are interesting (for $n\neq 4$ at least). Any morphism that is not an embedding will factor through $S_n/A_n$, so the image is either trivial or cyclic of order $2$, and of course those are no big deal. I am a bit puzzled by your phrasing of the comment, though: any homomorphism between symmetric groups that restricts to an embedding on $A_n$ is an embedding of $S_n$, so I don't understand your disjunction. –  Arturo Magidin Aug 24 '10 at 17:26
    
@Arturo Magidin: got it. You're of course right about me mixing up quotient and subgroups, sorry. @jp: I was referring to the second comment by Jack Schmidt; if the image is not transitive, then you can simply decompose the action into orbits, so that seems no big deal to me. The point seems to be that there are a wild bunch of subgroups of $S_m$ that are isomorphic to $S_n$, but are contained into another proper subgroups. Those are not susceptible to be classified, if I am not mistaken. –  Benoît Kloeckner Aug 25 '10 at 7:58
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.