MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This question is suggested by that about L^p multipliers (and the answer by Michael Lacey in particular). Let E be a measurable set in the plane and XiE its characteristic function. We say E is an Lp multiplier set iff the translation invariant operator F(Tf) = XiE F(f) (F = Fourier Transform), extends to a bounded operator on L^p (it is a-priori defined on the Schwartz Class or L^2\cap L^p). For example in dimension 1 every interval is an L^p multiplier for every p except 1 and infty. The situation strongly differs in the 2-dimensional case, as highlighted by the solution of the ball multiplier conjecture by C. Fefferman: the ball B is a strict L^2 multiplier (not L^p for p\neq 2) and the same is true for every set with an appropriate curvature. I was wondering whether more generally something can be said about the interval of p for which E is an L^p multiplier, in terms of the "geometry" of E, in dimension 2 or higher.

share|cite|improve this question

The only result along these lines that I am aware of is due to Vebedev and Olevskii (Idempotents of Fourier multiplier algebra. Geom. Funct. Anal. 4 (1994), no. 5, 539--544. ). Their result states that if a set E \subset R^d does not agree (almost everywhere) with an open set, then it can not be a L^p multiplier for p \neq 2.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.