MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $T$ be a torus defined over a field $K$ of characteristic $p>0$. Suppose that $T$ acts (algebraically) on some vector space $V$ (over the same field $K$). Let $W$ be a subspace of $V$. Now consider $N_T(W)$, the normalizer in $T$ of $W$. I would like to be sure that this is a closed connected subgroup of $T$; i.e. I'd like it to be a torus. Is this true in general?

Here's a more specific question (supposing that the first question is too hard, or is not true in general). Consider $G=UT$ a solvable linear algebraic subgroup of $GL_r$. Suppose that $U_1$ is some subgroup of $U$. I'd like to be sure that $N_T(U_1)$ is a subtorus of $T$. I'm most interested in the situation when $p$ is large (I can imagine that this statement may only be true for $p>r$, say, but this is fine for the application I have in mind.)

share|cite|improve this question
What do you mean by normalizer? The subgroup of elements in $T$ which map $W$ into itself? – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Jul 26 '10 at 7:12
If so, then if $\{w_1,\dots,w_n\}$ is a basis of $W$, the condition that an element $t\in T$ preserve $W$ is equivalent to having the rank of the matrices $\{w_1,\dots,w_n,t\cdot w_i\}$ equal to $n$, for each $i\in\{1,dots,n\}$: in terms of $t$, this is a polynomial condition. – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Jul 26 '10 at 7:16
No. Use scheme-theoretic normalizer: functor whose value on $K$-alg. $A$ is set of $t \in T(A)$ carrying $W \otimes_K A$ into itself. By Def. A.1.9ff in "Pseudo-reductive groups", rep'td by closed $K$-subgp scheme $N_T(W)$ in $T$ which acts on $W$ via auts; question is whether it's smooth & conn'd. Can assume $K$ alg. closed and $W \ne 0$. Passing to dim($W$)-th exterior powers, can assume $W$ is a line in $V$. Express basis of $W$ in terms of $T$-eigenbasis of $V$, so $N_T(W)$ is defined by equating some $T$-weights in $V$. Thus, $N_T(W)$ is often disconn'd and non-smooth, for any $p$. – BCnrd Jul 26 '10 at 7:57
Moreover, $N_T(W)$ can be disconnected in characteristic zero. Take $\mathbb{G}_m$ acting on $\mathbb{A}^2$ by $t : (x,y) \to (tx, t^3 y)$. Take $W$ to be the line spanned by some vector $(x,y)$, with $x$ and $y$ nonzero. Then $N_T(W) = \{ t : t^3=t \} = \{ \pm 1 \}$ which is disconnected in characteristic not $2$. – David Speyer Jul 26 '10 at 12:18
Speyer's example illustrates the potential for non-smoothness that BCnrd mentioned: $N_T(W)$ is not smooth in char. 2 (it is isomorphic to the finite diagonalizable group scheme $\mu_2$). – George McNinch Jul 26 '10 at 15:04
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Your more specific question is not actually more specific. $\mathbb{G}_m^n \ltimes \mathbb{G}_a^n$ embeds in $GL_{2n}$ as $\left( \begin{smallmatrix} T & U \\ 0 & 1 \end{smallmatrix} \right)$, where $U$ is embedded along the diagonal. If $U$ is any $T$-rep, we can embed $T \ltimes U$ into $\mathbb{G}_m^n \ltimes \mathbb{G}_a^n$ for $n$ large enough (after a possible extension of the base field, see discussion below). And, of course, every vector subspace of $U$ is a subgroup. So all of the examples BConrad and I bring up will occur in examples of the form you discuss.

You can ensure that $N_T(U)$ is smooth for $p$ large: the equations defining $N_T(U)$ will all be of the form $\chi_i(t)=1$ for various characters $\chi_i$ of $T$. Once $p$ gets up above the torsion in $\mathrm{Char}(T)/\langle \chi_1, \chi_2, \ldots, \chi_N \rangle$, this will be smooth. But, as my example points out, you can't force this to be connected.

share|cite|improve this answer
Can you really embed any torus $T$ into a split torus? The point counts don't seem to work out over a finite field. – S. Carnahan Jul 26 '10 at 16:37
Oh, you are right. All the counter-examples above are split, but the general argument doesn't work. – David Speyer Jul 26 '10 at 16:43
Scott, since the normalizer scheme exists over the ground field and its formation commutes with any ext'n of the ground field, to verify if it is a torus it's harmless to extend scalars to an alg. closed ground field. Thus, one loses nothing by considering only split $T$. (Irrespective of finite fields, since the category of tori over any field is anti-equivalent to the category of Galois lattices via "geometric char. group", we see that any subtorus or quotient torus of a split torus is split, and likewise any extension of a split torus by a split torus is split, over any field.) – BCnrd Jul 26 '10 at 17:11
What is $r$? In any case, I suspect that a counter-example to your guess is to consider the sequence of two-dimensional vector spaces where $\mathbb{G}_m$ acts by $t: (x,y) \to (t x, t^N x)$, and the subspace $U_1$ spanned by $(1,1)$. Then, over $\mathbb{C}$, there are $N-1$ connected components of $N_T(U_1)$. So we can get as many components as we want, while keeping the dimensions of $U$, $U_1$ and $T$ fixed. – David Speyer Jul 27 '10 at 2:37
Can't you do $GL_4$, with $\left( \begin{matrix} t & 0 & x & 0 \\ 0 & t^N & 0 & y \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{matrix} \right)$? – David Speyer Jul 27 '10 at 17:50

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.