MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

For a partition $\lambda$ let $S^{\lambda}$ be the corresponding Schur functor. Is it true that for every $\lambda$ there exists an irreducible representation $V$ of a finite nonabelian group $G$ such that $S^{\lambda}(V)$ is still irreducible?

This is not obvious to me even for the symmetric and exterior powers (although maybe I'm not thinking hard enough), so any partial results would be appreciated.

share|cite|improve this question
I hope you don't mind too much that I made a little edit for clarity. I found the original statement very confusing. – Ben Webster Jul 18 '10 at 22:03
Ben's edit makes the question more precise, but I'm unclear about the motivation for it. Would there be interesting consequences (for general linear groups or for finite groups) if $f$ can be computed explicitly or if the boundedness is somehow shown to be true or false? The question is intriguing, but also puzzling. Classical Schur-Weyl theory gives good algorithmic knowledge of the constituents of tensor powers of $V$` for general linear groups over $\mathbb{C}$; but neither this nor the finite subgroups are known in closed form as $n$ grows (eventually all finite groups appear). – Jim Humphreys Jul 18 '10 at 22:08
@Ben: Thanks. @Jim: The motivation is vaguer than the question, which is why I wasn't sure whether to put it in. For any representation V of a finite group G we know that V^{\otimes k} decomposes into parts corresponding to the irreps of GL(V), which by Schur-Weyl duality can be labeled by some irreps of S_k. I want to know if this is the best one can do for a "generic" group G, e.g. whether each of these representations is actually irreducible for some finite group G and some representation V. If I've got the statement of the problem right, this is equivalent to f being unbounded. – Qiaochu Yuan Jul 18 '10 at 22:31
I have edited the statement of the question to reflect my motivation more accurately. – Qiaochu Yuan Jul 18 '10 at 22:40
The answer is no, for the sixth symmetric power in characteristic zero. But I don't know if there is an easy proof. See "Symmetric powers and a problem of Kollar and Larsen," by Guralnick and Thiep. – moonface Jul 18 '10 at 22:57
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Since the Guralnick and Tiep paper is very long, I thought I would summarize my understanding of it. Note that I only learned about this result from moonface last night, so I am hardly an expert. This answer is community wiki, in case anyone can improve on my summary.

We want to establish the following result: Let $G$ be a finite noncommutative subgroup of $GL(V)$, with $V$ a $\mathbb{C}$ vector space. Let $k \geq 6$. Then $\mathrm{Sym}^k(V)$ is reducible. (If $G$ is commutative and $V$ is one dimensional then, of course, $\mathrm{Sym}^k(V)$ is always one dimensional and hence irreducible.)

Our proof is by induction on $|G|$. Our base case will be when $G$ is a central extension of a simple group.

Choose a nontrivial normal subgroup $H$ of $G$ such that $G/H$ is simple. If we can't do this then $G$ is simple and we are in the base case. Let $V \cong \bigoplus U_i$ be the decomposition of $V$ into $H$-isotypic components. If there is more than one summand, then $\bigoplus \mathrm{Sym}^k(U_i)$ is a nontrivial $G$-subrep of $\mathrm{Sym}^k(V)$. So we may assume that $V \cong W \otimes X$, where $W$ is an $H$-irrep and $H$ acts trivially on $X$. Then one can show (proof of lemma 2.5) then $G$ is contained in $GL(W) \times GL(X)$. (This is nontrivial but not deep; you could give it as a problem in a graduate-level representation theory course.)

Then $\mathrm{Sym}^k(W) \otimes \mathrm{Sym}^k(X)$ is a subrepresentation of $\mathrm{Sym}^k(V)$. This subrep is proper unless $\dim X=1$ or $\dim W=1$. If $\dim X=1$, then $V$ is an irrep of $H$ and $\mathrm{Sym}^k(V)$ is irreducible as an $H$-rep, so we are done by induction.

If $W$ is one dimensional, then $H$ acts on $V$ by scalars, so $H$ is central. So we are in our base case: a central extension of a simple group. This case is done by group cohomology and the classification of simple groups. See section 4 for groups of Lie type, section 6 for alternating groups and section 7 for sporadic groups.

share|cite|improve this answer

By averaging, over $\mathbb R$ every representation of a finite group can be given a positive definite inner product so that the action is orthogonal. And my memory is that Schur functurs of representations of $\operatorname{O}(n)$ are not usually irreducible. For example, $\operatorname{Sym}^2(\mathbb R^n)$ has a one-dimensional summand over $\operatorname{O}(n)$, given by the trace w.r.t. the inner product on $\mathbb R^n$. This suggests to me that over any finite group, the essential image of $\operatorname{Sym}^2$ contains very few irreps. But maybe I am in error.

share|cite|improve this answer
It sounds like you mean that Sym^2(V) is reducible unless dim(V) = 1? SL(2,3) has some 2 dim reps with Sym^2 irreducible. This appears somewhat common. Checking a standard list of character tables, one sees there are examples for Sym^2 in dimensions 2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,18,20,21,26,28,32,41,42,43,45,60,342,1333; examples for Sym^3 in dimensions 2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,12,13,14,18,20,32; examples for Sym^4 in dimensions 2,4,6,12; and examples for Sym^5 in dimensions 2,4,6,12. There were no examples for Sym^6 as indicated by Guralnick and Thiep. Maybe this is a U(n) versus O(n) problem? – Jack Schmidt Jul 19 '10 at 12:33
Yeah, I think all this is saying is that the Frobenius–Schur indicator indicates whether the trivial rep is a summand of the 2nd symmetric power, the 2nd exterior power, or neither. O(n) reps means it is a summand of the 2nd symmetric power. It's pretty common for an irrep not to be realized in O(n). – Jack Schmidt Jul 19 '10 at 13:21
Ah, so I was in error. It was late last night, after some wine, that I wrote my answer :) – Theo Johnson-Freyd Jul 19 '10 at 17:03

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.