As you know DNA is composed of strings of 4 letters. I am wondering if the number 4 here has any significance? Any property of 4 that makes using 4 letters more advantageous over more (or less) letters to encode information?
Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)
|
9
3
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
10
|
A short (and not entirely correct) answer is: redundancy. There is a very nice article on this in Brian Hayes' book, Group Theory in the Bedroom. The precursor of the chapter appeared in the American Scientist: "The Invention of the Genetic Code". One interesting aspect of the story is that George Gamov proposed several clever triplet genetic codes of great abstract beauty. Other physicists and mathematicians (Feynman, Teller, Golomob) also made suggestions. But nature chose its own path. |
||||||
|
You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.
|
1
|
A 1993 PRL by Hornos and Hornos suggested that the evolution of the genetic code manifests itself through symmetry breaking. According to them the basic symmetry is supposed to be $SU(2)^{\otimes 3}$ (three nucleotides per codon). |
|||
|

