MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The purpose of this question is to find out whether one can view the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence as a particular case of the "composition of derived functors" spectral sequence.

The Leray spectral sequence of a continuous map $f:X\to Y$ of topological spaces can be constructed as follows. Let $a_X:X\to pt$ and $a_Y:Y\to pt$ be the maps from $X$ and $Y$ respectively to the one point space $pt$; we obviously have $a_X=a_Y\circ f$. So for any sheaf $L$ on $X$ we have $(a_X)_\ast L=(a_Y)_*f_\ast L$. But $(a_X)_\ast$ is just the functor of the global sections and so is $(a_Y)_*$. Recall that if $A,B$ and $C$ are abelian categories and $F:A\to B,G:B\to C$ are left exact functors, then (under mild hypotheses) $R_\ast(G\circ F)$ is isomorphic to $R_\ast\circ G_\ast$ and for any object $X$ of $A$ there exists a spectral sequence abutting $R^\ast (G\circ F) X$ with the $E_2$ sheet given by $E_2^{pq}=R^pG(R^q F(X))$. See e.g Gelfand-Manin, Methods of homological algebra, 3.7.

Applying this to the case when $A$, $B$ and $C$ are the categories of sheaves of $X$, $Y$ and the point respectively we get a spectral sequence $(E^{pq}_r,d_d)$ abutting to $H^*(X,F)$ with the $E_2$ term given by $$E_2^{pq}=H^p(Y,R^q f_\ast L).$$

If $X$ and $Y$ are sufficiently nice (say finite CW complexes), $F$ is constant and $f$ is a locally trivial fibration with fiber $F$, then we get (assuming for simplicity that $Y$ is simply-connected) $$E_2^{pq}=H^q(Y,H^q(F)).$$

Now, if we have an extraordinary cohomology theory $h^\ast$, we can construct (under the hypotheses of the previous paragraph) the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence: the $E_2$ sheet is given by $$E_2^{pq}=H^q(Y,h^q(F))$$ and the spectral sequence abuts to $h^*(X)$. This looks pretty similar to the Leray spectral sequence, so it seems natural to ask whether it can be obtained in a way similar to the one described above.

Namely, given an extraordinary cohomology theory $h^\ast$ and a continuous map $f:X\to Y$ of topological spaces, is there an "extraordinary direct image" functor $f^{ex}_*$ from sheaves on $X$ to sheaves on $Y$ which would be "functorial in $f$" and which would give $h^{\ast}(X)$ after deriving when $Y$ is a point?

If not, is there still a way to view the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence as (a version of) the spectral sequence of the composition of two derived functors? (It may happen that one has to consider something other than the categories of sheaves, but I have no idea what this could be.)

share|cite|improve this question
The following theorem might be relevant: if we have a functor C from finite CW-pairs to chain complexes st. 0 -> C(A) -> C(X) -> C(X,A) -> 0 is short exact and the homology of C is a homology theory, then C represents ordinary homology. This is shown in a paper by Burdick, Conner and Floyd and illustrates that extraordinary homology theories do not fit very well in a classical chain complex context. – Lennart Meier Jul 17 '10 at 18:15

I'd like to propose that the answer is "No, but..". The viewpoint I'd like to suggest is that thinking of "derived functors" is probably insufficient here (because we're secretly interested in homotopical categories that are not derived categories of abelian categories), but that we are relying essentially on the observation that $R\Gamma(X, -) = R\Gamma(Y, Rf_* -)$. So what follows is a sketch-construction that gives a positive answer to a related question you could've been asking: "We can get the Serre spectral sequence from the Leray spectral sequence. Can we get the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence in a similarly sheaf-theoretic way?"

We get the Leray spectral sequence by studying sheaves of complexes of $\mathbb{Z}$-modules. The "derived" category (of sheaves of complexes of $\mathbb{Z}$-modules) is the derived category of its heart (sheaves of $\mathbb{Z}$-modules) w.r.t. the usual $t$-structure, so it's reasonable that we get lots of mileage from looking at derived functors, composites of derived functors, etc.

Analogously, we can think of more general Atiyah-Hirzebruch type spectral sequences as arising from studying sheaves of spectra. This is not the derived category of its heart w.r.t. the usual $t$-structure (this heart is again sheaves of $\mathbb{Z}$-modules). But, this does give a way of thinking about Atiyah-Hirzebruch type spectral sequences:

We start with (say) the "constant sheaf of spectra" $\mathbf{E}$ on $X$, and we're interested in computing the (homotopy groups of the spectrum) $$R\Gamma(X, \mathbf{E}) = R\Gamma(Y, Rf_* \mathbf{E})$$ The spectral sequence of interests arises by filtering $Rf_* \mathbf{E}$ using the $t$-structure (Postnikov sections "on values"), $$\cdots \to \tau_{\geq k} Rf_* \mathbf{E} \to \tau_{\geq (k-1)} Rf_* \mathbf{E}\to \cdots \to \mathbf{E}$$ The $k$-th "associated graded piece" of this filtration is $\pi_k Rf_* \mathbf{E}$ (which, recall, is an object in the heart --- i.e., a sheaf of $\mathbb{Z}$-modules on $Y$). This gives rise to a spectral sequence (excuse the funny indexing!, and no comment on convergence) $$ E^2_{p,q} = \pi_{-p} R\Gamma\left(Y, \pi_{-q} Rf_* \mathbf{E}\right) \Rightarrow \pi_{-p-q} R\Gamma\left(Y, Rf_*\mathbf{E}\right) = \pi_{-p-q} R\Gamma(X,\mathbf{E})$$ The funny indexing was picked so that I can rewrite it as $$ H^p(Y, \pi_{-q} Rf_* \mathbf{E}) \Rightarrow E^{p+q}(X) $$

To recover the usual form of AH-SS we need the following observation (analogous to what we'd need to get the Serre spectral sequence via sheaf theory): If $f$ is nice (i.e., a fibration between reasonable spaces), then $\pi_{-q} Rf_* E$ will be the locally constant sheaf associated to $E^{q}(F)$ with its monodromy action.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks, Anatoly! This sounds very interesting but what exactly is the category of sheaves of spectra? – algori Jul 17 '10 at 3:20
The "short answer" is you start with a(n infinity-)category of presheaves of spectra, and impose descent with respect to covers. (What's a sheaf? For any cover, the map from $\mathcal{F}(U)$ to a certain equalizer is an isomorphism. The infinity-cat. version will be that the map from $\mathcal{F}(U)$ to the holim of a Cech-type cosimplicial diagram is an equivalence.) If enough infinity-categorical machinery is in place, this is as much of a definition as the usual definition of a sheaf (of sets/abelian groups). You can find as much detail as you want in ... (continued) ... – Anatoly Preygel Jul 17 '10 at 3:41
.. some combination of Lurie's "Higher Topos Theory" (with more good stuff in Appendix A to DAG VI), or for a more classical perspective something like May-Sigurdsson "Parameterized homotopy theory." What I call "sheaves of spectra" would go under "ex-spectra" in those terms. – Anatoly Preygel Jul 17 '10 at 3:43
Finally, I should mention that in this example we only ever needed to work with "locally constant" sheaves of spectra. Just as locally constant sheaves of e.g., vector spaces admit a simpler description on nice spaces (as "local systems"), so it is for spectra. Details are in above refs, but here's the intuitive sketch: At each point, you have a spectrum. For each path, you have an equivalence between the spectra over them; for any two composable paths, you have a way of "filling in the triangle" (i.e., a homotopy between the two resulting maps); etc. – Anatoly Preygel Jul 17 '10 at 3:49
Anatoly -- thanks, but could you please give more details or a more specific reference? I'm sure there is plenty of good stuff to be found in Lurie's Higher topos theory or in Appendix A to DAG VI but it is still not clear to me what exactly the category is that $E$ is an object of. Moreover, how one defines $Rf_{\ast}$ and $R\Gamma$ for sheaves of spectra? So far the beginning of your argument looks exactly like what one would do in the classical case, with abelian groups replaced with spectra. – algori Jul 19 '10 at 20:00

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.