Related to A000679 (Number of groups of order $2^n$), how many non-Abelian groups of order $2^n$ are there?
Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)
|
3
1
|
|||||||||
|
|
6
|
It is true that there is no known formula for the number of isomorphism classes of groups of order $n$, but there is a very nice asymptotic formula for $p$-groups. In particular, the number of isomorphism classes of groups of order $p^n$ grows as $p^{\frac{2}{27}n^3 + O(n^{8/3})}$. This function grows very rapidly, and there is a folklore conjecture that "almost all groups are $2$-groups." |
|||||
|
You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.
|
2
|
Marshall Hall and James Senior published a book The Groups of order 2n (n <= 6) in the 1960's. It's in the common room in the math department here at UCSB. Using rather obscure notation it arranges the conjugacy classes into lattices. Online you can find a list of all groups of order 64. |
||||||
|
|
1
|
It is as Qiaochu Yuan says, and worse: the number of abelian groups of order 2^n are not complicated. They are direct products of cyclic groups of order 2^m. The number of non-abelian groups is unknown. We don't actually have a formula. We just have exhaustive analyses for a few small values of n. |
||
|
|
|
0
|
I don't think there's a general method of approaching this.There are several methods of obtaining all the Abelian groups of order n for specific n-such as the finite groups of prime order are all cyclic and therefore Abelian,etc. Unless n is very large,proceeding in this manner will usually get the number of groups down to a managable size and what remains should be non-Abelian. I think that's the best you can do unless you want to add the condition that the remaining groups are simple-in which case,a Sylow analysis would be appropriate and would considerably simplify things. There are a few general results on non-Abelian groups-like a finite group G is nonAbelian if there are 2 elements in G whose commutator is nontrivial i.e. not the identity. But I don't know if you can use these kinds of results to get the kind of general formula you want-I don't think you can,although I could be wrong on this. The best discussions I know of such matters can be found in Herstien's Topics in Algebra,2nd edition and I.Martin Issacs' Finite Group Theory. |
|||||
|

