# Maximum number of mutually equidistant points in an n-dimensional Euclidean space is (n+1). Proof? [closed]

How to prove that the maximum number of mutually equidistant points in an n-dimensional Euclidean space is (n+1)?

-

## closed as too localized by Robin Chapman, Gjergji Zaimi, Yemon Choi, S. Carnahan♦Jul 2 '10 at 13:17

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Induction. The points equidistant to two points in R^n form a hyperplane which is isomorphic to R^{n-1}. – Qiaochu Yuan Jul 2 '10 at 5:00
how to prove the induction step then? thanks – Nick Jul 2 '10 at 5:18
Start with a point $P_1$, all the others must lie in some (n-1)-dimensional sphere. The same applies to $P_2$ and so $P_3,\dots$ will lie in an (n-2)-dimensional sphere. Iterate. This gives you a bound of $\le n+2$ but it is easy to see that when you reach the 1-dimensional sphere (two points) in the end, you can only pick at most one of them, and so you have the bound $\le n+1$ – Gjergji Zaimi Jul 2 '10 at 5:29
Put one point at the origin. The Gram matrix of $n$ further points equidistant from the origin and each other is nonsingular. – Robin Chapman Jul 2 '10 at 6:19
Prove by induction that any two sets of $n+1$ equidistant points in $\mathbb{R}^n$ are isometric. In the induction step, observe that the distance between the two possible choices of the last point is greater than $1$ (this requires a small computation). This proof is close to Gjergij's argument. – Victor Protsak Jul 2 '10 at 6:31

## 1 Answer

Assume one of the points is the origin, the others are the vectors a1,...,an+1. If the pairwise distance is 1, then $a^2_i=1$ and $(a_i-a_j)^2=1$ (i < j)(scalar multiplication). This gives $(a_i,a_j)=\frac{1}{2}$. Now show that $a_1,\dots,a_{n+1}$ are linearly independent: if $\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_{n+1}$ are scalars and $\sum \lambda_ia_i=0$, then scalar multiplication by $a_i$ gives $\lambda_i+\frac{1}{2}\sum_{j\neq i}\lambda_j=0$, then we have $\lambda_i=-\Lambda$ for each $i$ where $\Lambda=\lambda_1+\cdots+\lambda_{n+1}$, summing gives $\Lambda=0$ so each $\lambda_i=0$.

-