Sign up ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

C. Pugh and M. Shub showed in 1971 that, given an ergodic action of $G=\mathbb{R}^k$ on some separable finite measure space $(X,\mu)$, then all elements of $G$ , off a countable family of hyperplanes, are ergodic.

Is there an analogous statement in the topological setting, with ergodicity replaced by minimality (i.e. all orbits are dense) and $X$ assumed to be compact ?

share|cite|improve this question
Coudy, I guess you should add some condition on $X$, for example that it is compact. I will delit my answer then... –  Dmitri Jun 23 '10 at 7:22
@Dmitri. Yes, sorry, I forgot the compactness assumption. –  coudy Jun 23 '10 at 8:03
Just out of curiousity: Is the Pugh/Shub argument hard? And can one explain it and explain why it doesn't extend? –  Helge Jun 23 '10 at 12:56
@Helge. An invariant measure gives a unitary representation of G on $L^2$. Here is a proof of the Pugh-Shub result for $k=1$. Let f be a $g_{t_0}$ invariant function for some $t_0$. Then $F(x) = \int_{0}^{t_0}\ f(g_s(x))\ e^{-2\pi i s/ t_0}\ ds$ is an eigenvector for the flow $g_t$, associated to the eigenvalue $e^{2\pi i/t_0}$. Eigenvectors associated to different eigenvalues are orthogonal. The conclusion follows, assuming $L^2$ is separable. –  coudy Jun 23 '10 at 18:17

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

A colleague pointed out the following counterexample. Let $h_t$ be the horocyclic flow on a negatively curved compact surface S. This R action is known to be minimal. Now Consider the $R^2$ action on $S\times S$ given by $(s,t)\rightarrow (h_s,h_t)$. This action is again minimal.

The action of the diagonal $\{(s,s), s\in R\}$ is not minimal since the orbit of any point (x,x) stays in the diagonal.

Let $\theta\in R$. The action of the line $\{(s,\theta s), s\in R\}$ is not minimal because it is conjugated to the diagonal action. This comes from the fact that the two actions $h_{\theta s}$ and $h_s$ are conjugated by the geodesic flow.

As a result, there are no elements in $R^2$ acting minimally, although $R^2$ itself acts minimally.

share|cite|improve this answer
Sorry, this may be naive, but isn't the action of the horocyclic flow also ergodic? this does not also contradicts Pugh-Shub's result? –  rpotrie Jul 8 '10 at 19:59
Yes, the action of the horocyclic flow is ergodic and mixing of all order. This implies that the diagonal action $(h_s,h_s)$ is also ergodic on SxS. So there are points $(x,y)$ with dense orbit under the diagonal action. But of course this does not imply that all orbits are dense. –  coudy Jul 9 '10 at 7:42
Ok, I understand. minimality is too much. Transitivity does work in this example though. Thanks –  rpotrie Jul 9 '10 at 13:57

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.