There is currently no treatise treating Hochschild (co)homology systematically. There is a chapter in Weibel's book, there's parts of Loday's and a few others...
What should be covered by such a mythical treatise?
|
25
16
|
There is currently no treatise treating Hochschild (co)homology systematically. There is a chapter in Weibel's book, there's parts of Loday's and a few others...
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
12
|
My wishlist: Hochschild (co)homology of (curved) A-infinity algebras/categories Relation to deformation theory Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg Hochschild-cyclic spectral sequence and relation to Hodge-de Rham spectral sequence Deligne conjecture Relation to Drinfeld center 2D TQFTs (Costello/Kontsevich/Hopkins-Lurie) |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
11
|
In addition to Kevin's excellent list: Formality The relation of Hochschild and cyclic homology with loop spaces (eg Jones' theorem) and the circle action on Hochschild homology operadic structure of $(HH^\ast,HH_*)$ (ie "calculus" a la Tsygan-Tamarkin), in particular the BV structure in the Calabi-Yau case Relation to the cotangent complex/ Andre-Quillen homology in the commutative case The role of Hochschild homology as recipient of characters (eg Chern characters and characters of representations) -- more generally the relation with algebraic K-theory topological Hochschild and cyclic homology, the cyclotomic trace, $K^S=THH$ HH for E_n algebras and the Deligne-Kontsevich conjecture Lie theoretic perspective ($HH^\ast$ as universal enveloping algebra of the Atiyah bracket on the shifted tangent complex, HKR theorem as PBW, $HH^*$ as the Lie algebra of autoequivalences of the derived category...) |
|||||||||||
|
|
8
|
A personal list.
|
||||||
|
|
8
|
I am working on producing an account from a modern perspective at Hochschild cohomology on the $n$Lab. Some of the wishlist items expressed here are already being covered to some extent. But clearly more needs to be done. |
|||
|
|
|
5
|
I really want to know more about Hochschild cohomology of commutative algebras, and its relation to the representations of $S_n$ and to free Lie algebras (beyond "there are these strange idempotents in $\mathbb Q\left[S_n\right]$ which happen to occur in both fields). |
||||||||||
|