MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $X,Y$ be normed vector spaces, X infinite dimensional. Can I find a linear map $T:X\rightarrow Y$ and a subset D of X such that D is dense in X, T is bounded in D (i.e. $\sup _{x\in D, x \neq 0} \frac{\|Tx\|}{\|x\|}<\infty $ but T is not bounded in X?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 21 down vote accepted

Matthew's answer reminded me of a fact that makes this easy: if $X$ is a normed space (say, over $\mathbb{R}$) and $f : X \to \mathbb{R}$ is a linear functional, then its kernel $\ker f$ is either closed or dense in $X$, depending on whether or not $f$ is continuous (i.e. bounded). The proof is trivial: $\ker f$ is a subspace of $X$ of codimension 1. Its closure is a subspace that contains it, so must either be $\ker f$ or $X$. And of course, a linear functional is continuous iff its kernel is closed. This is Proposition III.5.2-3 in Conway's A Course in Functional Analysis.

So let $f$ be an unbounded linear functional on $X$ (which one can always construct as in Matthew's example), and take $D = \ker f$. $D$ is dense by the above fact, and $f$ is identically zero on $D$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Yeah, nice! And it answers my questions: $\ker f$ is always a subspace. – Matthew Daws Jun 16 '10 at 21:15
It looks like the best possible answer! – Pierre-Yves Gaillard Jun 17 '10 at 3:45
Wonderful! I choose this as answer for simplicity and for the fact that it works in every infinite dimensional normed space – Nicolò Jun 17 '10 at 10:18
I wrote a tiny complement to this answer:… – Pierre-Yves Gaillard Jun 18 '10 at 4:50

Let $X$ be the space of real polynomials, normed as functions in $C[a,b]$. Here we want $0 < a < b$ fixed. Now define $T \colon X \to X$ so that $T(x^n) = 0$ if $n$ is even and $T(x^n) = nx^n$ if $n$ is odd. Then $T$ is unbounded, but it vanishes on the set of even polynomials. That set is dense by the Müntz-Szász theorem.

I think I have NOT used the Axiom of Choice.

share|cite|improve this answer
Nice example. One could also use Stone-Weierstrass in place of Müntz-Szász: the even polynomials are an algebra that separates points and contains the constants. – Nate Eldredge Jun 16 '10 at 19:43

Take a dense linear subspace $Z$ of $X$ such that $X/Z$ is infinite-dimension (algebraically). Let $x_1,x_2,\ldots$ be a sequence of elements of $X$ whose images in $X/Z$ are linearly indepdendent. We can define a linear map on the algebraic span on $Z$ and the $x_j$ which is zero on $Z$ and satisfies $\|Tx_n\|=n\|x_n\|$. Extend this to all $X$ by Zorn's lemma. Then $T$ is zero on the dense space $Z$ but unbounded on $X$.

share|cite|improve this answer
How do you guarantee the existence of such $Z$? If, say, $X$ is a separable Banach space, you could take $Z$ to be the algebraic span of a countable dense subset, and by the Baire category theorem it has uncountable algebraic codimension. But I don't see what to do if $X$ is incomplete (and possibly of countable algebraic dimension), or if $X$ is complete but not separable. – Nate Eldredge Jun 16 '10 at 18:18
Nate, there are certainly examples of $X$ which work, as you say, and these include many of the standard examples. For general normed spaces, I'm not sure. I would suspect that the intersection of the kernels of a sequence of linearly independent unbounded functionals might work, but whether there do exists such sequences, I'm not sure... – Robin Chapman Jun 16 '10 at 18:26
You don't need infinite codimension. Any nontrivial dense subspace does the job (codimension 1 is enough). And it is easy to construct a dense subsbace: find one in some closed subspace (e.g. a separable one), then add a complementary subspace. – Sergei Ivanov Jun 16 '10 at 19:50

X is infinite-dimensional, so we can find $(e_n)$ a linearly independent sequence in X; let X' be the span. By rescaling, we can assume that $\|e_n\|=1$ for each n. Define $T:X'\rightarrow \mathbb R$ (or $\mathbb C$, or embed into Y if you wish) by $T(e_n) = n$ for each n. Clearly T is unbounded on X'.

For each finite sum $x=\sum_{n=1}^N x_n e_n$ and $\epsilon>0$, we can choose $a\in\mathbb R$ and $m$ very large with $|a|<\epsilon$ and $T(x) = -am$. Set $y=x+ae_m$, so $T(y)=T(x)+am=0$ and also $\|x-y\| = |a|<\epsilon$. Let D' be the collection of all such $y$; as such $x$ exhaust X', we certainly have that D' is dense in X'.

Use Zorn to extend $E=\{e_n\}$ to $E'$ a basis of X. Extend T to X by setting $T(x)=0$ for $x\in E' \setminus E$. Let $D = D' + \text{span}(E'\setminus E)$, so D is dense in X, and T is bounded on D; actually T vanishes on D.

Now, D is certainly not a subspace: if you want that as well, I don't know!

share|cite|improve this answer

This is just to make Nate Eldridge's answer selfcontained.

For any normed vector space $V$ and any $r > 0$, write $V_r$ for the open ball of radius $r$ and center $0$ in $V$.

Let $X$ be a normed vector space, $Y$ a closed space, $Z$ the quotient, $\pi$ the canonical projection, $\tau$ the quotient topology, $\nu$ the topology on $Z$ induced by the quotient norm $$|\pi(x)|:=\inf_{y\in Y}|x+y|.$$

(It's easy to see that this is a norm.)

We claim $\tau=\nu$.

Both topologies are translation invariant.

The set $\{\pi(X_r)\ |\ r > 0\}$ is a basis for the $\tau$-neighborhoods of $0$ in $Z$.

The set $\{(Z_r)\ |\ r > 0\}$ is a basis for the $\nu$-neighborhoods of $0$ in $Z$.

As $\pi(X_r)=Z_r$, we're done.

share|cite|improve this answer

No. Bounded means continuous, for linear operators. If a linear operator is bounded (continuous) on a dense subset, then you can extend it continuously to the whole space, which means it is bounded.

share|cite|improve this answer
Your argument shows that $T |_D$ has a bounded extension to all of $X$, but this bounded extension need not be the same as $T$. – Mark Meckes Jun 16 '10 at 19:11
Not quite. The extension is continuous, but what if that extension is not the original map? Can't you have two linear maps that agree on a dense set, but differ off that dense set? – Gerald Edgar Jun 16 '10 at 19:15
For a concrete example: let X be the subspace of $c_0$ spanned by, say, the sequence $x_0=(1/n)$ and all the sequences which are eventually zero (that latter being the subspace $c_{00}$). Then you can define a linear map $T:X\rightarrow\mathbb R$ to be zero on $c_{00}$ and anything you like on $x_0$. But $c_{00}$ is dense in $X$. Your continuous extension is just the zero map! – Matthew Daws Jun 16 '10 at 19:25
Thanks guys, I understand the flaw in my reasoning now. – Tom LaGatta Jun 16 '10 at 20:47

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.