Hi
Just a short question. How are the IQR of the boxplot related to the confidence interval of a sample? Is the IQR actually the 50% confidence interval?
Hi Just a short question. How are the IQR of the boxplot related to the confidence interval of a sample? Is the IQR actually the 50% confidence interval? 


My answer didn't seem to score any points with anyone, and rdchat's answer is lousy, so let's look more closely. Suppose $X_1,\dots,X_n$ are an i.i.d. sample from a normally distributed population with unknown mean $\mu$ and unknown variance $\sigma^2$, and we seek a confidence interval for the population mean. As usual, let $\overline{X} = \left(X_1 + \cdots + X_n\right)/n$ be the sample mean and $S^2 = 1/(n1)\sum_{i=1}^n (X_i  \overline{X})^2$ be the (unbiased) sample variance. (BTW, unbiasedness is overrated. Everybody knows that, except some nonstatisticians. Apparently there are lots of those.) Now $$ \frac{\overline{X}  \mu}{\sigma/\sqrt{n}} $$ is normally distributed with mean 0 and variance 1, and $$ \frac{\overline{X}  \mu}{S/\sqrt{n}} $$ has a Student's tdistribution with $n1$ degrees of freedom (called "Student's" because it's named after William Sealey Gosset, of courseand some of the content of this forum makes one suspect that a lot of people here don't know that standard bit of folklore). Go to the table and look up the value of $A_n$ for which $$ \Pr\left( A_n < \frac{\overline{X}  \mu}{S/\sqrt{n}} < A_n \right) = \frac{1}{2}, $$ or in other words $$ \Pr\left(\overline{X}  A_n \frac{S}{\sqrt{n}} < \mu < \overline{X} + A_n \frac{S}{\sqrt{n}}\right) = \frac{1}{2}. $$ Then $$ \overline{X} \pm A_n \frac{S}{\sqrt{n}} $$ are the endpoints of a 50% confidence interval for $\mu$. Important point: The length of the confidence interval goes to 0 as the sample size increases, since $\sqrt{n}$ is in the denominator (and $A_n$ approaches the value one would get for the normal distribution rather than for Student's distribution). But the sample quartiles do not get closer together in the limit as $n$ grows, since ("almost surely") they approach the population quartiles. So the answer is NO. 


First, the interquartile range (IQR) is the difference between the third and first quartiles, which is a single number, not an interval. The interval $(Q_{1},Q_{3})$ might be considered a 50% confidence interval, but it's not a 50% confidence interval for the mean that you'd get from any of the usual formulas. 


You'd hope that as the sample size grows the 50% confidence interval for a location parameter would shrink whereas the first and third quartiles of the sample would approach those of the population. So no, that's not a 50% confidence interval except in special cases, e.g. when the sample size is 2. 

