Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $\gamma$ be a simple loop in a spine of a strongly irreducible Heegaard splitting of a closed 3-manifold $M$ with torsion-free fundamental group. Does $\gamma$ necessarily correspond to a primitive element of the fundamental group of $M$, or is it possible for $\gamma$ to be a power of some other element?

I suspect that $\gamma$ is not necessarily primitive in the fundamental group of $M$, but I do not know of any examples.

Edit: I added torsion-free fundamental group after Charlie's comment. In particular, I am most interested in this question for hyperbolic 3-manifolds.

share|improve this question
    
Take the genus one Heegaard splitting of $\mathbb{R}P(3)$. This is strongly reducible. As the fundamental group of $\mathbb{R}P(3)$ is $\mathbb{Z}_2$ it has roots of all odd orders so it isn't primitive. :) –  Charlie Frohman Jun 8 '10 at 22:54
    
Take a Seifert fibered space that doesn't have torsion in its fundamental group. Build a "vertical" Heegaard splitting starting with regular neighborhoods of singular fibers, and putting horizontal tubes in till the complement is a handlebody. The singular fibers will lie in the spine of one handlebody, and yet they are not primitive elements of the fundamental group, as they are powers of the generic fiber. You might be able to build a hyperbolic counterexample to order, but I don't know one of the cuff. –  Charlie Frohman Jun 9 '10 at 4:30
    
I guess I need to be careful that it is strongly reducible, so take a Seifert fibered space with three singular fibers over the sphere, so that its fundamental group is an extension of a hyperbolic triangle group, and its euler class is nontrivial. Build your Heegaard splitting from two fibers and one horizontal bar. That Heegaard splitting is strongly irreducible, as the manifold is small and irreducible and the splitting has minimal genus. –  Charlie Frohman Jun 9 '10 at 5:01
    
Its still wrong. As the singular fibers have the standard fibers as powers and not visa verse. –  Charlie Frohman Jun 9 '10 at 5:08
    
In fact, I think you can prove your statement for small Seifert fibered spaces because the vertical Heegaard splittings are the only strongly irreducible Heegaard splittings. Good question. –  Charlie Frohman Jun 9 '10 at 12:36
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 4 down vote accepted

New Answer: Take a 2-bridge knot, and perform hyperbolic Dehn filling (so that the core of the Dehn filling is geodesic), and so that the filling slope has intersection number $>1$ with the meridian. Then the meridian will not be primitive, since it will be a multiple of the core of the Dehn filling. 2-bridge knots have a genus two Heegaard splitting, which has a spine for the handlebody which is a wedge of two meridians at the bottom. This remains a spine in the Dehn filling, so the loops represented by the meridians are not primitive. This also works for the (2,n) torus knots (which are 2-bridge), so I think Charlie's answer is right (at least for many small Seifert fibered-spaces).

Old (non)Answer: Here's almost an example. All punctured torus bundles have Heegaard genus $\leq 3$, and many have Heegaard genus 3 (I discussed this once in my defunct blog). One may find a genus 3 Heegaard splitting of any once punctured torus bundle by taking two copies of a fiber, tubing them together along the boundary on one side, and adding a handle to the other side (drill out discs from both fibers, and glue an annulus in). By a theorem of Moriah-Rubinstein, most Dehn fillings will also have Heegaard genus 3 if the punctured torus bundle does.

The Heegaard splitting of the punctured torus bundle has one side which is a handlebody, and the other side a compression body. We may think of the handlebody as a product neighborhood of the fiber (which is a punctured torus) with a 1-handle attached. We may find a spine for the handlebody which consists of a wedge of two loops which is a spine for the punctured torus, together with another loop going through the 1-handle.

Now, the peripheral curve of the punctured torus is not primitive in Dehn fillings along curves which intersect the longitude multiple times. This curve is represented in the spine not as an embedded curve, but has multiplicity two (since it is a commutator of the generators). If we choose a small punctured torus bundle of genus three, most Dehn fillings will be small (non-Haken) of Heegaard genus 3, and so this Heegaard surface will be strongly irreducible. But the peripheral curve will not be primitive, since it will be a multiple of the core of the Dehn filling. However, it is not embedded in the spine.

Even though this doesn't answer the question, it gives a strategy for trying to find an example. Namely, if one can find a 1-cusped hyperbolic 3-manifold which is small, and contains an incompressible surface with boundary, such that the boundary slope is a generator in the surface, and such that a tubular neighborhood of the surface (or a slight modification by drilling a hole in a tubular neighborhood) is a minimal genus Heegaard splitting, then many Dehn fillings will have the desired property.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.