MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

There's a fair amount of work on valuations on (modular) lattices, by which I mean functions $v : \mathcal{L} \rightarrow R$ that satisfy the modular expression $$v(x) + v(y) = v(x \wedge y) + v(x \vee y) $$

I'm wondering if there's been any work on vector-valued valuations (where the range of v is $R^k$ and the same relation holds) ?

In addition, I'm also interested in lower valuations (I'm not sure if this name is standard) that satisfy the submodular inequality $$v(x) + v(y) \ge v(x \wedge y) + v(x \vee y) $$ and possibly the generalization to $R^k$ where we replace the above by $$v(x) + v(y) \succeq v(x \wedge y) + v(x \vee y) $$ ($\succeq$ being the coordinate-wise partial order)

This is a reference request, for the most part.

share|cite|improve this question
Is the last inequality $\succeq$ coordinatewise? – François G. Dorais Jun 4 '10 at 16:07
Yes, I was using the coordinate-wise partial order on $R^k$. I'll edit – Suresh Venkat Jun 4 '10 at 16:50
Such a $v$ is a $k$-ple of real valuations. Usually one studies the real linear combinations of the components, or the compact convex set of all real $v$ with $v(1)=1$, see Goodearl, von Neumann regular rings (rank functions on a regular ring are almost the same thing as normalized valuations on the lattice). In a direct product of $k$ irreducible continuous geometries your get your case. – user46855 Feb 15 '14 at 15:25

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.