Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is a subgroup of a finite group uniquely determined, up to conjugation, by the subset of conjugacy classes of the larger group that it intersects?

share|improve this question
    
This is certainly true when the subgroup intersects every conjugacy class, and when it intersects only one conjugacy class. See this recent related question: mathoverflow.net/questions/26979/… –  Jamie Vicary Jun 4 '10 at 9:59
5  
The subgroups < (13)(24) > and < (13)(24), (12)(34) > in $S_4$ intersect the same conjugacy classes and aren't even isomorphic! –  Steve D Jun 4 '10 at 11:10
    
Crikey! Thanks Steve. –  Jamie Vicary Jun 4 '10 at 12:24
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Let $G$ be the group of affine linear maps over the Galois field $k=GF(16)$ of order $16$. The elements of $G$ are maps from $k$ to itself of the form $x\mapsto ax+b$ where $a\in k^*$ and $b\in G$. Those with $a=1$ form a normal elementary abelian subgroup~$H$. All nontrivial elements of $H$ are conjugate. Then $H$ contains lots of subgroups of order $4$, thirty-five in all, each consisting of the identity and three elements of this conjugacy class of involutions. But these are not all conjugate under $G$; it is clear that such a subgroup has at most fifteen conjugates.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks Robin! That's neat. Could you give me a presentation of that group so that I can play with this example myself? –  Jamie Vicary Jun 4 '10 at 10:42
    
If you really want a presentation: generators $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, $x$. Let $a^2=\cdots=d^2=x^{15}=1$, $a,\ldots,d$ commute, $xax^{-1}=b$, $xbx^{-1}=c$, $xcx^{-1}=d$, $xdx^{-1}=ab$. –  Robin Chapman Jun 4 '10 at 10:53
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.